BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are associated significantly with responsiveness to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The objective of this study was to investigate the suitability of cytologic specimens for assessing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Sixty paired histologic and cytologic specimens of lung adenocarcinoma were collected. Exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were amplified using polymerase chain reaction, and the mutation status of each sample was analyzed by pyrosequencing. A comparison of EGFR mutation status between histologic specimens and cytologic specimens was performed. RESULTS: The overall EGFR mutation concordance rate between histologic specimens and corresponding cytologic specimens was 91.7%. No significant difference was observed in the concordance rate between cytologic specimens from primary lesions and specimens from metastatic lesions (P = .63). The following parameters were correlated with the most reliable EGFR mutation results using the pyrosequencing method (100% concordance with the corresponding histologic specimens) in cytologic samples: a DNA concentration >25 ng/μL, content of >30 tumor cells, or a tumor percentage >30%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, routinely prepared cytologic specimens were reliable sources for assessing EGFR mutation status. The authors concluded that cytologic specimens from metastatic lesions and primary tumors are suitable for the successful assessment of EGFR mutation status.
BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are associated significantly with responsiveness to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The objective of this study was to investigate the suitability of cytologic specimens for assessing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Sixty paired histologic and cytologic specimens of lung adenocarcinoma were collected. Exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were amplified using polymerase chain reaction, and the mutation status of each sample was analyzed by pyrosequencing. A comparison of EGFR mutation status between histologic specimens and cytologic specimens was performed. RESULTS: The overall EGFR mutation concordance rate between histologic specimens and corresponding cytologic specimens was 91.7%. No significant difference was observed in the concordance rate between cytologic specimens from primary lesions and specimens from metastatic lesions (P = .63). The following parameters were correlated with the most reliable EGFR mutation results using the pyrosequencing method (100% concordance with the corresponding histologic specimens) in cytologic samples: a DNA concentration >25 ng/μL, content of >30 tumor cells, or a tumor percentage >30%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, routinely prepared cytologic specimens were reliable sources for assessing EGFR mutation status. The authors concluded that cytologic specimens from metastatic lesions and primary tumors are suitable for the successful assessment of EGFR mutation status.
Authors: Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Hui Chen; Rajesh R Singh; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Jawad Manekia; Bedia A Barkoh; Hui Yao; Sharjeel Sabir; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Gregg Staerkel; John Stewart; Rajyalakshmi Luthra Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Sang Hwa Lee; Wan Seop Kim; Yoo Duk Choi; Jeong Wook Seo; Joung Ho Han; Mi Jin Kim; Lucia Kim; Geon Kook Lee; Chang Hun Lee; Mee Hye Oh; Gou Young Kim; Sun Hee Sung; Kyo Young Lee; Sun Hee Chang; Mee Sook Rho; Han Kyeom Kim; Soon Hee Jung; Se Jin Jang Journal: J Pathol Transl Med Date: 2015-10-13
Authors: Paweł Krawczyk; Rodryg Ramlau; Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko; Tomasz Powrózek; Marzena Anna Lewandowska; Janusz Limon; Bartosz Wasąg; Juliusz Pankowski; Jerzy Kozielski; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Aleksandra Szczęsna; Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk; Michał Skroński; Rafał Dziadziuszko; Paulina Jaguś; Ewelina Antoszewska; Justyna Szumiło; Bożena Jarosz; Aldona Woźniak; Wojciech Jóźwicki; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz; Monika Pasieka-Lis; Dariusz M Kowalski; Maciej Krzakowski; Jacek Jassem; Janusz Milanowski Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-03 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Ian A Cree; Zandra Deans; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Anders Edsjö; Etienne Rouleau; Francesc Solé; Erik Thunnissen; Wim Timens; Ed Schuuring; Elisabeth Dequeker; Samuel Murray; Manfred Dietel; Patricia Groenen; J Han Van Krieken Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 3.411