Literature DB >> 23225544

Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance at 12 and 24 months for detecting head and neck cancer recurrence.

Allen S Ho1, Gabriel J Tsao, Frank W Chen, Tianjie Shen, Michael J Kaplan, A Dimitrios Colevas, Nancy J Fischbein, Andrew Quon, Quynh-Thu Le, Harlan A Pinto, Willard E Fee, John B Sunwoo, Davud Sirjani, Wendy Hara, Mike Yao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In head and neck cancer (HNC), 3-month post-treatment positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) reliably identifies persistent/recurrent disease. However, further PET/CT surveillance has unclear benefit. The impact of post-treatment PET/CT surveillance on outcomes is assessed at 12 and 24 months.
METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis of HNC patients was carried out with long-term serial imaging. Imaging at 3 months included either PET/CT or magnetic resonance imaging, with all subsequent imaging comprised of PET/CT. PET/CT scans at 12 and 24 months were evaluated only if preceding interval scans were negative. Of 1114 identified patients, 284 had 3-month scans, 175 had 3- and 12-month scans, and 77 had 3-, 12-, and 24-month scans.
RESULTS: PET/CT detection rates in clinically occult patients were 9% (15 of 175) at 12 months, and 4% (3 of 77) at 24 months. No difference in outcomes was identified between PET/CT-detected and clinically detected recurrences, with similar 3-year disease-free survival (41% vs 46%, P = .91) and 3-year overall survival (60% vs 54%, P = .70) rates. Compared with 3-month PET/CT, 12-month PET/CT demonstrated fewer equivocal reads (26% vs 10%, P < .001). Of scans deemed equivocal, 6% (5 of 89) were ultimately found to be positive.
CONCLUSIONS: HNC patients with negative 3-month imaging appear to derive limited benefit from subsequent PET/CT surveillance. No survival differences were observed between PET/CT-detected and clinically detected recurrences, although larger prospective studies are needed for further investigation.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23225544     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  19 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide risk-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Bird; Sally Barrington; Selvam Thavaraj; Jean-Pierre Jeannon; Andrew Lyons; Richard Oakley; Ricard Simo; Mary Lei; Teresa Guerrero Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Yuko Suenaga; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takeaki Ishihara; Ryohei Sasaki; Naoki Otsuki; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Tsutomu Minamikawa; Naomi Kiyota; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Do circulating long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) (LincRNA-p21, GAS 5, HOTAIR) predict the treatment response in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Merdan Fayda; Mustafa Isin; Makbule Tambas; Murat Guveli; Rasim Meral; Musa Altun; Dilek Sahin; Gozde Ozkan; Yasemin Sanli; Husniye Isin; Emre Ozgur; Ugur Gezer
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT to detect subclinical HNSCC recurrence 6 months after the end of treatment.

Authors:  Philippe Robin; Ronan Abgral; Gérald Valette; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Nathalie Keromnes; Jean Rousset; Gaël Potard; Xavier Palard; Rémi Marianowski; Pierre-Yves Salaun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  FDG-PET/CT in the surveillance of head and neck cancer following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Louise Madeleine Risør; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Frederik Cornelius Loft; Andreas Ruhvald Madsen; Ivan Richter Vogelius; Andreas Kjær; Jeppe Friborg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Initial Performance of NI-RADS to Predict Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  D A Krieger; P A Hudgins; G K Nayak; K L Baugnon; A S Corey; M R Patel; J J Beitler; N F Saba; Y Liu; A H Aiken
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Evaluation of spheroid head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell models in comparison to monolayer cultures.

Authors:  Lorenz Kadletz; Gregor Heiduschka; Julian Domayer; Rainer Schmid; Elisabeth Enzenhofer; Dietmar Thurnher
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Perceived value drives use of routine asymptomatic surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin R Roman; Shivangi Lohia; Nandita Mitra; Marilene B Wang; Anna M Pou; F Christopher Holsinger; David Myssiorek; David Goldenberg; David A Asch; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Evaluating the potential role of PET/CT in the posttreatment surveillance of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Lara Dunn; David G Pfister
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.