OBJECTIVE: Although amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide deposition into insoluble plaques is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease; soluble oligomeric Aβ has been hypothesized to more directly underlie impaired learning and memory in dementia of the Alzheimer type. However, the lack of a sensitive, specific, and quantitative assay for Aβ oligomers has hampered rigorous tests of this hypothesis. METHODS: We developed a plate-based single molecule counting fluorescence immunoassay for oligomeric Aβ sensitive to low pg/ml concentrations of synthetic Aβ dimers using the same Aβ-specific monoclonal antibody to both capture and detect Aβ. The Aβ oligomer assay does not recognize monomeric Aβ, amyloid precursor protein, or other non-Aβ peptide oligomers. RESULTS: Aβ oligomers were detected in aqueous cortical lysates from patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type and nondemented patients with Aβ plaque pathology. However, Aβ oligomer concentrations in demented patients' lysates were tightly correlated with Aβ plaque coverage (r = 0.88), but this relationship was weaker in those from nondemented patients (r = 0.30) despite equivalent Aβ plaque pathology. The ratio of Aβ oligomer levels to plaque density fully distinguished demented from nondemented patients, with no overlap between groups in this derived variable. Other Aβ and plaque measures did not distinguish demented from nondemented patients. Aβ oligomers were not detected in cerebrospinal fluid with this assay. INTERPRETATION: The results raise the intriguing hypothesis that the linkage between plaques and oligomers may be a key pathophysiological event underlying dementia of the Alzheimer type. This Aβ oligomer assay may be useful for many tests of the oligomer hypothesis.
OBJECTIVE: Although amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide deposition into insoluble plaques is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease; soluble oligomeric Aβ has been hypothesized to more directly underlie impaired learning and memory in dementia of the Alzheimer type. However, the lack of a sensitive, specific, and quantitative assay for Aβ oligomers has hampered rigorous tests of this hypothesis. METHODS: We developed a plate-based single molecule counting fluorescence immunoassay for oligomeric Aβ sensitive to low pg/ml concentrations of synthetic Aβ dimers using the same Aβ-specific monoclonal antibody to both capture and detect Aβ. The Aβ oligomer assay does not recognize monomeric Aβ, amyloid precursor protein, or other non-Aβ peptide oligomers. RESULTS: Aβ oligomers were detected in aqueous cortical lysates from patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type and nondemented patients with Aβ plaque pathology. However, Aβ oligomer concentrations in demented patients' lysates were tightly correlated with Aβ plaque coverage (r = 0.88), but this relationship was weaker in those from nondemented patients (r = 0.30) despite equivalent Aβ plaque pathology. The ratio of Aβ oligomer levels to plaque density fully distinguished demented from nondemented patients, with no overlap between groups in this derived variable. Other Aβ and plaque measures did not distinguish demented from nondemented patients. Aβ oligomers were not detected in cerebrospinal fluid with this assay. INTERPRETATION: The results raise the intriguing hypothesis that the linkage between plaques and oligomers may be a key pathophysiological event underlying dementia of the Alzheimer type. This Aβ oligomer assay may be useful for many tests of the oligomer hypothesis.
Authors: Ming Jin; Nina Shepardson; Ting Yang; Gang Chen; Dominic Walsh; Dennis J Selkoe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert M Koffie; Melanie Meyer-Luehmann; Tadafumi Hashimoto; Kenneth W Adams; Matthew L Mielke; Monica Garcia-Alloza; Kristina D Micheva; Stephen J Smith; M Leo Kim; Virginia M Lee; Bradley T Hyman; Tara L Spires-Jones Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joseph L Price; Daniel W McKeel; Virginia D Buckles; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; Michael Grundman; Lawrence A Hansen; Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Charles D Smith; Daron G Davis; Frederick A Schmitt; William R Markesbery; Jeffrey Kaye; Roger Kurlan; Christine Hulette; Brenda F Kurland; Roger Higdon; Walter Kukull; John C Morris Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2009-04-18 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Heinz Hillen; Stefan Barghorn; Andreas Striebinger; Boris Labkovsky; Reinhold Müller; Volker Nimmrich; Marc W Nolte; Claudia Perez-Cruz; Ingrid van der Auwera; Fred van Leuven; Marcel van Gaalen; Anton Y Bespalov; Hans Schoemaker; James P Sullivan; Ulrich Ebert Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Katherine E Schwetye; John R Cirrito; Thomas J Esparza; Christine L Mac Donald; David M Holtzman; David L Brody Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Jungsu Kim; Joseph M Castellano; Hong Jiang; Jacob M Basak; Maia Parsadanian; Vi Pham; Stephanie M Mason; Steven M Paul; David M Holtzman Journal: Neuron Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Jacques Fantini; Coralie Di Scala; Nouara Yahi; Jean-Denis Troadec; Kevin Sadelli; Henri Chahinian; Nicolas Garmy Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Jessica M Mc Donald; Tiernan T O'Malley; Wen Liu; Alexandra J Mably; Gunnar Brinkmalm; Erik Portelius; William M Wittbold; Matthew P Frosch; Dominic M Walsh Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Edward J Wild; Roberto Boggio; Douglas Langbehn; Nicola Robertson; Salman Haider; James R C Miller; Henrik Zetterberg; Blair R Leavitt; Rainer Kuhn; Sarah J Tabrizi; Douglas Macdonald; Andreas Weiss Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ross W Paterson; Jamie Toombs; Catherine F Slattery; Jonathan M Schott; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.074