Literature DB >> 23225289

How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice.

Sarah Jane Besser1, Janet E Anderson, John Weinman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Non-adherence inhibits successful treatment of osteoporosis. This study used a theoretical framework to explore osteoporosis patients' cognitive and emotional representations of their illness and medication, using both interviews and drawing. We recorded some misconceptions patients have about their condition and medication which could act as barriers to treatment adherence.
PURPOSE: Despite the high efficacy of current treatments in reducing fracture risk, poor adherence is still a problem in osteoporosis. This qualitative study aims to inform the development of a psychological intervention to increase adherence through the investigation of osteoporosis patients' perceptions of their illness and medication. The self-regulation model (Leventhal) provided the framework for the study.
METHOD: Participants were 14 female outpatients from a London teaching hospital who suffer with osteoporosis or osteopenia. Data were collected using both semi-structured interviews and drawings. Drawings were used to elicit participants' visual representations (imagery) of their condition.
RESULTS: We found that patients held illness and medication beliefs that were not in accord with current scientific evidence. Interviews revealed that participants had good knowledge of what osteoporosis is, but they had low understanding of the role of medication in reducing fracture risk, various concerns about the side effects of medication, poor understanding of the causes of osteoporosis and uncertainty about how it can be controlled. Additionally, drawings elicited more information about the perceived effects of osteoporosis and emotional reactions to the condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis sufferers need a better understanding of their fracture risk and what they can do to control their condition. Concerns about medication need to be addressed in order to improve adherence, particularly in relation to the management of side effects. Since drawings of osteoporosis were found to arouse emotions, it is concluded that risk communication in osteoporosis could benefit from using visual images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23225289     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-012-0089-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  18 in total

1.  Challenges and opportunities to improve fracture liaison service attendance: fracture registration and patient characteristics and motivations.

Authors:  P van den Berg; P M M van Haard; P P Geusens; J P van den Bergh; D H Schweitzer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Systematic scoping review of patients' perceived needs of health services for osteoporosis.

Authors:  L Chou; P Shamdasani; A M Briggs; F M Cicuttini; K Sullivan; K L M D Seneviwickrama; A E Wluka
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Osteoporosis prevention: where are the barriers to improvement in a French general population? A qualitative study.

Authors:  B Merle; C Dupraz; J Haesebaert; L Barraud; M Aussedat; C Motteau; V Simon; A M Schott; M Flori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Management of osteoporosis of the oldest old.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; J Branco; M-L Brandi; S Boonen; O Bruyère; P Cacoub; C Cooper; A Diez-Perez; J Duder; R A Fielding; N C Harvey; M Hiligsmann; J A Kanis; J Petermans; J D Ringe; Y Tsouderos; J Weinman; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quality of Life Is Related to Social Support in Elderly Osteoporosis Patients in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Lina Ma; Yun Li; Jieyu Wang; Hong Zhu; Wei Yang; Ruojin Cao; Yuying Qian; Ming Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography.

Authors:  K L Barker; F Toye; C J Minns Lowe
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Qualitative Insights from the Osteoporosis Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A E Bombak; H M Hanson
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 8.  Using drawings to explore patients' perceptions of their illness: a scoping review.

Authors:  Melissa Mei Yin Cheung; Bandana Saini; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-11-24

9.  Development of an mHealth Application for Women Newly Diagnosed with Osteoporosis without Preceding Fractures: A Participatory Design Approach.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn Jakobsen; Anne Pernille Hermann; Jens Søndergaard; Uffe Kock Wiil; Jane Clemensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Application of the health belief model and social cognitive theory for osteoporosis preventive nutritional behaviors in a sample of Iranian women.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Alireza Hidarnia; Mohammad Hossein Kaveh; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Alireza Askari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.