Literature DB >> 23225252

Do pregnant women and their partners make an informed choice about first trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome, and are they satisfied with the choice?

Louise Bangsgaard1, Ann Tabor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: All pregnant women in Denmark are offered risk assessment for Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women and partners make an informed choice about first trimester risk assessment, and their satisfaction with the choice.
METHODS: A survey using multiple measure of informed choice at 12 weeks and decision regret scale at 30 weeks, among pregnant women and partners, planning to deliver at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-one women (99.6%) out of 534 women chose to have risk assessment. Most women and men had high degree of knowledge (82% and 81%) and positive attitudes regarding risk assessment (97% and 98%), leading to 79% and 80% making an informed choice. Education predicted knowledge for women (odds ratio 3.42; 95% confidence interval 1.63-7.18) and partners (odds ratio 2.97; 95% confidence interval 1.37-6.45), country of origin predicted knowledge, attitude and informed choice among women. Three hundred thirty-two women (99%) and all partners were satisfied with having chosen risk assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although 80% of pregnant women and partners make an informed choice about undergoing first trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome, as many as 20% do not. At 30 weeks nearly all women and partners were satisfied to have had a risk assessment performed.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23225252     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  11 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Influence of Prenatal Counseling on the Attitudes and Preferences Toward Invasive Prenatal Testing Among Women in Their First Trimester of Pregnancy (INVASIVE).

Authors:  Fernanda Paz Y Miño; Raigam Jafet Martinez-Portilla; Montse Pauta; Antoni Borrell
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Coping with worry while waiting for diagnostic results: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples following a high-risk prenatal screening result.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Camilla P Nielsen; Lone Hvidman; Olav B Petersen; Mette B Risør
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A qualitative study looking at informed choice in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Experiences and expectations in the first trimester of pregnancy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Michal Frumer; Mette M Schlütter; Olav B Petersen; Ida Vogel; Camilla P Nielsen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Danish Sonographers' Experiences of the Introduction of "Moderate Risk" in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Møller; Ida Vogel; Olav Bjørn Petersen; Stina Lou
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-10-09

6.  Knowledge of Prenatal Screening, Down Syndrome, Amniocentesis, and Related Factors among Iranian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Zahra Jouhari; Ashraf Pirasteh
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-04

7.  Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Kathrine Carstensen; Ida Vogel; Lone Hvidman; Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen; Maja Lanther; Olav Bjørn Petersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

9.  Impact of a new national screening policy for Down's syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte K Ekelund; Finn Stener Jørgensen; Olav Bjørn Petersen; Karin Sundberg; Ann Tabor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-27

10.  Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kam On Kou; Chung Fan Poon; Wai Ching Tse; Shui Lam Mak; Kwok Yin Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.