Literature DB >> 23224771

Surgical technique: supine patient position with the contralateral leg elevated for femoral intramedullary nailing.

Ahmet Firat1, Osman Tecimel, Alper Deveci, Ali Ocguder, Murat Bozkurt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing can be performed with a fracture table or manual traction. Manual traction can be applied with the patient in either the supine or lateral decubitus (LD) position. However, in either of these positions, the reduction can be difficult because the fractured extremity is not positioned parallel to the floor and the contralateral leg on the operating room table overlaps the fractured limb while the fractured extremity is in full adduction. Therefore fluoroscopy time may be increased. Accordingly, we developed a technique with the patient supine and the contralateral leg elevated (SCLE). DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: We performed anterograde femoral intramedullary nailing with the patient in the supine position with the contralateral leg elevated to allow easy nail entry, reduction, and locking. In this position, the uninjured leg was placed on the leg holder in a semilithotomy position to allow full hip adduction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 63 patients treated with intramedullary nailing: 30 with the SCLE position (mean age, 38 years; 30% female) and 33 with the LD position (mean age, 37 years; 36% female). From the medical records we extracted demographic information, fracture pattern, intramedullary nail diameter, duration of fluoroscopy and operation, and complications. At the last visit, extremity lengths, rotation, and alignment were determined. Minimum followup was 46 months (mean, 46 months; range, 20-72 months).
RESULTS: The mean durations of surgery and fluoroscopy were shorter for the SCLE group than the LD group: 98 versus 108 minutes and 3.4 versus 3.8 minutes, respectively. The open reduction rate was less in the SCLE group when compared with the LD group: 10% versus 36%.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe the SCLE technique is a reasonable treatment choice for femoral intramedullary nailing as it facilitates obtaining orthogonal views of the femur while possibly shortening surgery and fluoroscopy times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224771      PMCID: PMC3549150          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2722-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Prevention of fat embolism by early internal fixation of fractures in patients with multiple injuries.

Authors:  E B Riska; H von Bonsdorff; S Hakkinen; H Jaroma; O Kiviluoto; T Paavilainen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  L B Bone; K D Johnson; J Weigelt; R Scheinberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Comminuted and rotationally unstable fractures of the femur treated with an interlocking nail.

Authors:  D A Wiss; C H Fleming; J M Matta; D Clark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoral intramedullary nailing: comparison of fracture-table and manual traction. a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  David J G Stephen; Hans J Kreder; Emil H Schemitsch; Lisa B Conlan; Lisa Wild; Michael D McKee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Intraoperative reduction techniques for difficult femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures.

Authors:  R L Jaarsma; D F M Pakvis; N Verdonschot; J Biert; A van Kampen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Primary intramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  P J O'Brien; R N Meek; J N Powell; P A Blachut
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1991-01

8.  Rotational deformities after femoral shaft fractures in childhood. A retrospective study 27-32 years after the accident.

Authors:  K J Brouwer; J C Molenaar; B van Linge
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981-02

9.  Comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft treated by intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  R A Winquist; S T Hansen
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures. A report of forty-eight cases.

Authors:  B O Thoresen; A Alho; A Ekeland; K Strømsøe; G Follerås; A Haukebø
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Evolution and principles of intramedullary locked nailing].

Authors:  C Hierholzer; J Friederichs; P Augat; A Woltmann; O Trapp; V Bühren; C von Rüden
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing in a lateral position].

Authors:  J Friederichs; C von Rüden; C Hierholzer; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.