Literature DB >> 23224529

Scientific ethics. Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole.

Martin Enserink.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 23224529     DOI： 10.1126/science.338.6112.1270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Research accomplishments that are too good to be true.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The natural selection of bad science.

Authors:  Paul E Smaldino; Richard McElreath
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.

Authors:  Stefan P L de Jong; Elena Ketting; Leonie van Drooge
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-10-08

Review 4.  Safe oxygen saturation targeting and monitoring in preterm infants: can we avoid hypoxia and hyperoxia?

Authors:  Augusto Sola; Sergio G Golombek; María Teresa Montes Bueno; Lourdes Lemus-Varela; Claudia Zuluaga; Fernando Domínguez; Hernando Baquero; Alejandro E Young Sarmiento; Diego Natta; Jose M Rodriguez Perez; Richard Deulofeut; Ana Quiroga; Gabriel Lara Flores; Mónica Morgues; Alfredo García-Alix Pérez; Bart Van Overmeire; Frank van Bel
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.299
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.