Literature DB >> 23222922

Evaluation of reading speed and contrast sensitivity in dry eye disease.

William H Ridder1, Yi Zhang, Jing-Feng Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visual disturbance is a common symptom reported by patients with dry eye disease (DED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual performance, including reading speed and contrast sensitivity, in control and DED subjects.
METHODS: Fifty-two DED patients (mild, n = 17; moderate, n = 22; severe, n = 13; based on corneal staining and the Ocular Surface Disease Index ≥ 20) and 20 control subjects (Ocular Surface Disease Index <13, no corneal staining) took part in this study. The age ranges for the control and DED patients were 18 to 45 years and 19 to 84 years, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Holladay Automated Contrast Sensitivity System, and reading speed was determined using the Wilkins Rate of Reading Test. Analysis of covariance was conducted to compare clinical characteristics among subject groups while adjusting for age, sex, and study site. Partial correlation coefficients from linear regression were used to measure the linear relationship between contrast sensitivity and reading speed with DED parameters.
RESULTS: The log of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuities and contrast sensitivity were not significantly different across subject groups. The DED patients (134.9 ± 4.95 words per minute) exhibited slower reading speeds than the control subjects (158.3 ± 8.40 words per minute, p = 0.046). As DED severity increased, the reading speed decreased (141.0 ± 7.96 words per minute, 136.8 ± 7.15 words per minute, and 127.0 ± 9.63 words per minute in mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively). Reading rate was found to correlate weakly with corneal staining based on a partial correlation coefficient (-0.345, p < 0.001) but not with other DED parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The reading rate was lower in DED subjects than that in control subjects. As the DED severity increased, the reading rate decreased. This finding is consistent with patient-reported symptoms and provides direct evidence for the impact of DED on reading performance. These findings suggest that reading speed may be used to monitor treatment benefit in DED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23222922     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182780dbb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  9 in total

Review 1.  The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Messmer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Study design and baseline findings from the progression of ocular findings (PROOF) natural history study of dry eye.

Authors:  Peter J McDonnell; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Michael E Stern; David R Hardten; Taryn Conway; Linda Villanueva; David A Hollander
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 3.  Use of the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) in Clinical Research: A Review.

Authors:  George W Ousler; David Rimmer; Lisa M Smith; Mark B Abelson
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-09-27

4.  A Water-free 0.1% Cyclosporine A Solution for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Results of the Randomized Phase 2B/3 ESSENCE Study.

Authors:  John D Sheppard; David L Wirta; Eugene McLaurin; Blair E Boehmer; Joseph B Ciolino; Alice S Meides; Thomas Schlüter; George W Ousler; Dale Usner; Sonja Krösser
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  Can Nutrition Play a Role in Ameliorating Digital Eye Strain?

Authors:  Drake W Lem; Dennis L Gierhart; Pinakin Gunvant Davey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  The IMPACT study: a prospective evaluation of the effects of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% on ocular surface staining and visual performance in patients with dry eye.

Authors:  Karl G Stonecipher; Gail L Torkildsen; George W Ousler; Scot Morris; Linda Villanueva; David A Hollander
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13

Review 7.  Dry eye syndrome: developments and lifitegrast in perspective.

Authors:  Ivonne V Lollett; Anat Galor
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-15

8.  An investigation of low power convex lenses (adds) for eyestrain in the digital age (CLEDA).

Authors:  Robert Yammouni; Bruce Jw Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-04-22

9.  Is reading rate in digital eyestrain influenced by binocular and accommodative anomalies?

Authors:  Robert Yammouni; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-10-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.