PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of Parkinson disease using clinical and demographic data alone and when combined with information from genes associated with Parkinson disease. METHODS: A total of 1,967 participants in the dbGAP NeuroGenetics Research Consortium data set were included. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with Parkinson disease at a genome-wide significance level in previous genome-wide association studies were included in risk prediction. Risk allele scores were calculated as the weighted count of the minor alleles. Five models were constructed. Discriminatory capability was evaluated using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Both family history and genetic risk scores increased risk for Parkinson disease. Although the fullest model, which included both family history and genetic risk information, resulted in the highest area under the curve, there were no significant differences between models using family history alone and those using genetic information alone. CONCLUSION: Adding genome-wide association study-derived genotypes, family history information, or both to standard demographic risk factors for Parkinson disease resulted in an improvement in discriminatory capacity. In the full model, the contributions of genotype data and family history information to discriminatory capacity were similar, and both were statistically significant. This suggests that there is limited overlap between genetic risk factors identified through genome-wide association study and unmeasured susceptibility variants captured by family history. Our results are similar to those of studies of other complex diseases and indicate that genetic risk prediction for Parkinson disease requires identification of additional genetic risk factors and/or better methods for risk prediction in order to achieve a degree of risk prediction that is clinically useful.Genet Med 2013:15(5):361-367.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of Parkinson disease using clinical and demographic data alone and when combined with information from genes associated with Parkinson disease. METHODS: A total of 1,967 participants in the dbGAP NeuroGenetics Research Consortium data set were included. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with Parkinson disease at a genome-wide significance level in previous genome-wide association studies were included in risk prediction. Risk allele scores were calculated as the weighted count of the minor alleles. Five models were constructed. Discriminatory capability was evaluated using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Both family history and genetic risk scores increased risk for Parkinson disease. Although the fullest model, which included both family history and genetic risk information, resulted in the highest area under the curve, there were no significant differences between models using family history alone and those using genetic information alone. CONCLUSION: Adding genome-wide association study-derived genotypes, family history information, or both to standard demographic risk factors for Parkinson disease resulted in an improvement in discriminatory capacity. In the full model, the contributions of genotype data and family history information to discriminatory capacity were similar, and both were statistically significant. This suggests that there is limited overlap between genetic risk factors identified through genome-wide association study and unmeasured susceptibility variants captured by family history. Our results are similar to those of studies of other complex diseases and indicate that genetic risk prediction for Parkinson disease requires identification of additional genetic risk factors and/or better methods for risk prediction in order to achieve a degree of risk prediction that is clinically useful.Genet Med 2013:15(5):361-367.
Authors: Mohamad Saad; Suzanne Lesage; Aude Saint-Pierre; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Diana Zelenika; Jean-Charles Lambert; Marie Vidailhet; George D Mellick; Ebba Lohmann; Franck Durif; Pierre Pollak; Philippe Damier; François Tison; Peter A Silburn; Christophe Tzourio; Sylvie Forlani; Marie-Anne Loriot; Maurice Giroud; Catherine Helmer; Florence Portet; Philippe Amouyel; Mark Lathrop; Alexis Elbaz; Alexandra Durr; Maria Martinez; Alexis Brice Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Michael A Nalls; Vincent Plagnol; Dena G Hernandez; Manu Sharma; Una-Marie Sheerin; Mohamad Saad; J Simón-Sánchez; Claudia Schulte; Suzanne Lesage; Sigurlaug Sveinbjörnsdóttir; Kári Stefánsson; Maria Martinez; John Hardy; Peter Heutink; Alexis Brice; Thomas Gasser; Andrew B Singleton; Nicholas W Wood Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carles Vilariño-Güell; Christian Wider; Owen A Ross; Justus C Dachsel; Jennifer M Kachergus; Sarah J Lincoln; Alexandra I Soto-Ortolaza; Stephanie A Cobb; Greggory J Wilhoite; Justin A Bacon; Bahareh Behrouz; Heather L Melrose; Emna Hentati; Andreas Puschmann; Daniel M Evans; Elizabeth Conibear; Wyeth W Wasserman; Jan O Aasly; Pierre R Burkhard; Ruth Djaldetti; Joseph Ghika; Faycal Hentati; Anna Krygowska-Wajs; Tim Lynch; Eldad Melamed; Alex Rajput; Ali H Rajput; Alessandra Solida; Ruey-Meei Wu; Ryan J Uitti; Zbigniew K Wszolek; François Vingerhoets; Matthew J Farrer Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Gregory S Hageman; Karen Gehrs; Serguei Lejnine; Aruna T Bansal; Margaret M Deangelis; Robyn H Guymer; Paul N Baird; Rando Allikmets; Cosmin Deciu; Paul Oeth; Lorah T Perlee Journal: Hum Genomics Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.639
Authors: Matthew E Mealiffe; Renee P Stokowski; Brian K Rhees; Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; David A Hinds Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Taye H Hamza; Cyrus P Zabetian; Albert Tenesa; Alain Laederach; Jennifer Montimurro; Dora Yearout; Denise M Kay; Kimberly F Doheny; Justin Paschall; Elizabeth Pugh; Victoria I Kusel; Randall Collura; John Roberts; Alida Griffith; Ali Samii; William K Scott; John Nutt; Stewart A Factor; Haydeh Payami Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Bhuvan Molparia; Brian N Schrader; Eli Cohen; Jennifer L Wagner; Sandeep R Gupta; Sherrie Gould; Nelson Hwynn; Emily G Spencer; Ali Torkamani Journal: PeerJ Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.984