Literature DB >> 23222144

A European consistency for functioning of RECs? We just lost our chance.

Marcin Waligora1.   

Abstract

On 17 July 2012, the European Commission formally adopted a proposal for a new European Union (EU) Directive regarding clinical trials, which will repeal and replace the existing Directive 2001/20/EC. The main reasons for the revision were: (1) the decreasing number of clinical trials in the region and (2) harsh criticism of the present version of the Directive. The proposed regulation could simplify the rules for conducting clinical trials and also rebuild the entire system of clinical trial assessment. However, it seems that we probably have already lost our chance regarding the consistency and quality of functioning of research ethics committees in the EU.

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Commissions/Councils; Drugs and Drug Industry; Ethics Committees/Consultation; Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23222144     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Is a requirement of personalised assent realistic? A case from the GABRIEL project.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Input analysis for two public consultations on the EU Clinical Trials Regulation.

Authors:  Holger Langhof; Jonas Lander; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-09-17

3.  Non-beneficial pediatric research: individual and social interests.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.