Literature DB >> 23222064

Mesenchymal traits and cancer stem cells in mammospheres: chicken or egg?

Mohammad Kohandel1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23222064      PMCID: PMC3562292          DOI: 10.4161/cc.22936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis states that tumors are initiated and maintained by a subset of cancer cells with the ability to self-renew and to differentiate into cells of various lineages. Putative CSCs have been identified in a variety of human malignancies including breast cancer. Breast CSCs expressing the cell surface markers CD44high/CD24low were able to generate tumors when transplanted in small numbers in immunocompromised NOD/SCID mice. In addition to the cell sorting method, breast CSCs have been identified in vitro by their ability to grow as mammospheres (MS) in non-adherent, serum-free conditions. MS obtained in these pro-stem culture conditions have been shown to be enriched in cells expressing CD44high/CD24low markers. Beside stem-like features, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) appears to play a critical role in breast cancer progression. EMT is a process wherein epithelial cells undergo multiple changes that enable them to adopt mesenchymal features, including enhanced capacity for migration, invasiveness and elevated resistance to apoptosis. EMT programs are orchestrated by a set of pleiotropic transcription factors, including Slug, Snail, Twist and Zeb1, which can directly repress levels of E-cadherin, the hallmark of the epithelial state. N-cadherin, the mesenchymal intermediary filament vimentin and extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as fibronectin are mesenchymal markers. Mani et al. and Morel et al. independently found that the activation of the EMT program in both normal and transformed mammary epithelial cells is associated with the acquisition of stem cell properties, including the ability to form spheres in non-adherent cultures. In addition, recent studies have shown that the subtypes of breast carcinomas enriched in stem features, such as claudin-low tumors, also express EMT markers. Borgna et al. have studied distinct subtypes of breast cancer cell lines (luminal, HER2-positive, basal-like and claudin-low) under MS-proficient conditions (suspension). Their results suggest that the growth in suspension as MS favors the expansion of cells with mesenchymal traits (Fig. 1). For instance, an increase in the expression of vimentin has been observed in seven out of 10 cell lines, along with a significant decrease in the expression of the E-cadherin epithelial marker CDH1. Moreover, Borgna et al. have also observed a global increment in the expression of EMT transcription factors Zeb1, Zeb2, Snail2 and Twist 1. Overall, their data provide evidence for a shift toward a mesenchymal phenotype, along with stemness features, under proficient culture conditions. This supports the use of MS as an in vitro model for the study of therapeutic approaches targeting mesenchymal phenotypes.

Figure 1. Borgna et al. have shown that breast cancer cells grown as MS are enriched in both SC features and EMT markers.

Figure 1. Borgna et al. have shown that breast cancer cells grown as MS are enriched in both SC features and EMT markers. The enrichment in mesenchymal features under MS-proficient conditions may be due to an increase in the proportion of a pre-existing subpopulation of cells with mesenchymal phenotype, or by de novo induction of EMT. Interestingly, Borgna et al. have observed the gain of mesenchymal features in short-term MS in MCF7 cells (a luminal cell line) lacking enrichment in the CD44high/CD24low fraction, suggesting that the gain of mesenchymal phenotype may precede the acquisition of stem-like features. This is an important observation that can be further validated by a functional assessment of MS under different culture conditions, as cells acquire an EMT and then a stem cell profile. We have recently developed a quantitative approach to validate different possible scenarios that can lead to the enrichment of stem cell activity following induction of EMT., Additionally, we have suggested the utility of comparing mammosphere data to computational mammosphere simulations in elucidating the growth characteristics of mammary CSCs. I anticipate that this “modus operandi” of using quantitative modeling (grounded in experimental data) to gain new insights may well provide a rational means for predicting the timeline of the acquisition of mesenchymal and stem features. The process of EMT and its relationship to CSCs are novel and rapidly converging directions of research, and many related questions may be considered. For instance, it would be interesting to use the suggested MS culture conditions to develop and validate novel and effective therapeutic strategies, followed by in vivo validations. Moreover, in vitro MS studies under tumor microenvironmental conditions, such as hypoxia, may provide further information, which can be also validated by in vivo experiments.
  9 in total

1.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Wissam M Abdallah; Jessica M Foley; Kyle W Jackson; Michael F Clarke; Mari J Kawamura; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties.

Authors:  Dario Ponti; Aurora Costa; Nadia Zaffaroni; Graziella Pratesi; Giovanna Petrangolini; Danila Coradini; Silvana Pilotti; Marco A Pierotti; Maria Grazia Daidone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Quantitative approaches to cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  C Turner; M Kohandel
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 5.  Cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition: concepts and molecular links.

Authors:  Christina Scheel; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells.

Authors:  Sendurai A Mani; Wenjun Guo; Mai-Jing Liao; Elinor Ng Eaton; Ayyakkannu Ayyanan; Alicia Y Zhou; Mary Brooks; Ferenc Reinhard; Cheng Cheng Zhang; Michail Shipitsin; Lauren L Campbell; Kornelia Polyak; Cathrin Brisken; Jing Yang; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics.

Authors:  Bryan T Hennessy; Ana-Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Michael Z Gilcrease; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Ju-Seog Lee; Jane Fridlyand; Aysegul Sahin; Roshan Agarwal; Corwin Joy; Wenbin Liu; David Stivers; Keith Baggerly; Mark Carey; Ana Lluch; Carlos Monteagudo; Xiaping He; Victor Weigman; Cheng Fan; Juan Palazzo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Laura K Nolden; Nicholas J Wang; Vicente Valero; Joe W Gray; Charles M Perou; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Mesenchymal traits are selected along with stem features in breast cancer cells grown as mammospheres.

Authors:  Silvia Borgna; Michela Armellin; Alessandra di Gennaro; Roberta Maestro; Manuela Santarosa
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Anne-Pierre Morel; Marjory Lièvre; Clémence Thomas; George Hinkal; Stéphane Ansieau; Alain Puisieux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ovo Like Zinc Finger 2 (OVOL2) Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cell Traits and Correlates with Immune Cells Infiltration.

Authors:  Jiafa Wu; Dongping Luo; Shengnan Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2022-08-15

2.  A differential role for CXCR4 in the regulation of normal versus malignant breast stem cell activity.

Authors:  Matthew P Ablett; Ciara S O'Brien; Andrew H Sims; Gillian Farnie; Robert B Clarke
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.