OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intraindividual pharmacokinetics (PKs) of total (protein bound plus unbound) and unbound lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) and to assess whether the pediatric formulation (100 mg/25 mg) can overcome any pregnancy-associated changes. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal PK study. METHODS: HIV-infected pregnant antiretroviral therapy-naive and experienced women receiving LPV/RTV 400 mg/100 mg tablets twice daily. Intensive PK evaluations were performed at 20-24 weeks (PK1), 30 weeks (PK2) followed by empiric dose increase using the pediatric formulation (100 mg/25 mg twice daily), 32 weeks (PK3), and 8 weeks postpartum (PK4). RESULTS: Twelve women completed prespecified PK evaluations. Median (range) age was 28 (18-35) years and baseline BMI was 32 (19-41) kg/m. During pregnancy, total area under the time concentration (AUC0-12h) for LPV was significantly lower than postpartum (PK1, PK2, or PK3 vs. PK4, P = 0.005). Protein-unbound LPV AUC0-12h remained unchanged during pregnancy [PK1: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) vs. PK2: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) μg·h/mL, P = 0.4] despite a 25% dose increase [PK2 vs. PK3: 1.8 (1.3-2.1) μg·h/mL, P = 0.5]. Protein-unbound LPV predose concentrations (C12h) did not significantly change despite dose increase [PK2: 0.10 (0.08-0.15) vs. PK3: 0.12 (0.10-0.15) μg/mL, P = 0.09]. Albumin and LPV AUC0-12h fraction unbound were correlated (rs = 0.3, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Total LPV exposure was significantly decreased throughout pregnancy despite the increased dose. However, the exposure of unbound LPV did not change significantly regardless of trimester or dose. Predose concentrations of unbound LPV were not affected by the additional dose and were 70-fold greater than the minimum efficacy concentration. These findings suggest dose adjustments may not be necessary in all HIV-infected pregnant women.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intraindividual pharmacokinetics (PKs) of total (protein bound plus unbound) and unbound lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) and to assess whether the pediatric formulation (100 mg/25 mg) can overcome any pregnancy-associated changes. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal PK study. METHODS:HIV-infected pregnant antiretroviral therapy-naive and experienced women receiving LPV/RTV 400 mg/100 mg tablets twice daily. Intensive PK evaluations were performed at 20-24 weeks (PK1), 30 weeks (PK2) followed by empiric dose increase using the pediatric formulation (100 mg/25 mg twice daily), 32 weeks (PK3), and 8 weeks postpartum (PK4). RESULTS: Twelve women completed prespecified PK evaluations. Median (range) age was 28 (18-35) years and baseline BMI was 32 (19-41) kg/m. During pregnancy, total area under the time concentration (AUC0-12h) for LPV was significantly lower than postpartum (PK1, PK2, or PK3 vs. PK4, P = 0.005). Protein-unbound LPV AUC0-12h remained unchanged during pregnancy [PK1: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) vs. PK2: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) μg·h/mL, P = 0.4] despite a 25% dose increase [PK2 vs. PK3: 1.8 (1.3-2.1) μg·h/mL, P = 0.5]. Protein-unbound LPV predose concentrations (C12h) did not significantly change despite dose increase [PK2: 0.10 (0.08-0.15) vs. PK3: 0.12 (0.10-0.15) μg/mL, P = 0.09]. Albumin and LPV AUC0-12h fraction unbound were correlated (rs = 0.3, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Total LPV exposure was significantly decreased throughout pregnancy despite the increased dose. However, the exposure of unbound LPV did not change significantly regardless of trimester or dose. Predose concentrations of unbound LPV were not affected by the additional dose and were 70-fold greater than the minimum efficacy concentration. These findings suggest dose adjustments may not be necessary in all HIV-infected pregnant women.
Authors: R L Murphy; S Brun; C Hicks; J J Eron; R Gulick; M King; A C White; C Benson; M Thompson; H A Kessler; S Hammer; R Bertz; A Hsu; A Japour; E Sun Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-01-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: M Homma; K Beckerman; S Hayashi; A L Jayewardene; K Oka; J G Gambertoglio; F T Aweeka Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: Marta Boffito; Patrick G Hoggard; W Edward Lindup; Stefano Bonora; Alessandro Sinicco; Saye H Khoo; Giovanni Di Perri; David J Back Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Bernard Masquelier; Dominique Breilh; Didier Neau; Sylvie Lawson-Ayayi; Valérie Lavignolle; Jean-Marie Ragnaud; Michel Dupon; Philippe Morlat; F Dabis; H Fleury Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Marta Boffito; David J Back; Terrence F Blaschke; Malcolm Rowland; Richard J Bertz; John G Gerber; Veronica Miller Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Paolo Denti; Anneke C Hesseling; Louvina E van der Laan; Anthony J Garcia-Prats; H Simon Schaaf; Tjokosela Tikiso; Lubbe Wiesner; Mine de Kock; Jana Winckler; Jennifer Norman; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Stein Schalkwijk; Rob Ter Heine; Angela Colbers; Edmund Capparelli; Brookie M Best; Tim R Cressey; Rick Greupink; Frans G M Russel; José Moltó; Mark Mirochnick; Mats O Karlsson; David M Burger Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Ahizechukwu C Eke; Nahida Chakhtoura; Angela Kashuba; Brookie M Best; Craig Sykes; Jiajia Wang; Alice M Stek; Elizabeth Smith; Samantha Calabrese; Edmund V Capparelli; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Beverly E Sha; Camlin Tierney; Xin Sun; Alice Stek; Susan E Cohn; Robert W Coombs; Barbara Bastow; Francesca T Aweeka Journal: Jacobs J AIDS HIV Date: 2015-05-16
Authors: Alice Stek; Brookie M Best; Jiajia Wang; Edmund V Capparelli; Sandra K Burchett; Regis Kreitchmann; Kittipong Rungruengthanakit; Tim R Cressey; Lynne M Mofenson; Elizabeth Smith; David Shapiro; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ahmed Hamed Salem; Aksana Kaefer Jones; Marilia Santini-Oliveira; Graham P Taylor; Kristine B Patterson; Angela M Nilius; Cheri Enders Klein Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 5.191