Literature DB >> 23221907

Comparison of acquisition costs of surgical supplies in different health care systems for cataract and glaucoma procedures.

Jeremy Valentine1, David Zurakowski, Ramesh S Ayyala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine cost identification and acquisition cost comparison of surgical supplies for performing cataract and glaucoma procedures.
METHODS: This is a nonrandomized comparative and cross-sectional study. Six health care systems [state-run charity hospital, a private university hospital, 2 ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), and 2 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers] participated in the study. A list of input prices for disposable surgical items necessary for phacoemulsification with intraocular lens and for trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC), Ex-PRESS shunt placement, and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) with scleral patch graft was administered to 6 facilities. The total acquisition costs for each surgery at each facility was calculated as the sum of necessary items' costs. All costs are expressed in 2011 US dollars. Total acquisition costs for phacoemulsification/intraocular lens, trabeculectomy with MMC, Ex-PRESS shunt and AGV with scleral patch graft implantation in different health care settings were the main outcome measures.
RESULTS: The state-run hospital had the highest overall cost of disposable items for both cataract surgery ($648) and trabeculectomy with MMC ($339), whereas the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers had the lowest acquisition costs for cataract ($386) and the ASC ($96) for trabeculectomy. The ASC system had the lowest cost for both Ex-PRESS shunt ($707) and AGV ($865), whereas the University ($1352 for the Ex-PRESS) and the state ($1338 for AGV) had the highest cost. Average difference between total disposable item acquisition costs and Medicare payment after different surgeries per case is as follows: $544.29 for cataract surgery, $1834.50 for trabeculectomy, $763.30 for Ex-PRESS shunt, and $1315.00 for the AGV surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The ASC system had the lowest acquisition cost for disposable items for both cataract and glaucoma surgeries, whereas the university hospital and the state hospital carried the highest costs on an average. Among the 3 glaucoma procedures compared, trabeculectomy has the lowest acquisition costs for disposable items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23221907     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318279ca63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

Review 1.  Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review.

Authors:  Elad Moisseiev; Eran Zunz; Rotem Tzur; Shimon Kurtz; Gabi Shemesh
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Drug-Free, Nonsurgical Reduction of Intraocular Pressure for Four Months after Suprachoroidal Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel.

Authors:  J Jeremy Chae; Jae Hwan Jung; Wei Zhu; Brandon G Gerberich; Mohammad Reza Bahrani Fard; Hans E Grossniklaus; C Ross Ethier; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between initial trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS in terms of achieving an intraocular pressure below 15 and 18 mmHg: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Shunsuke Nakakura; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 4.  Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma: A Review of the Literature with Updates on Surgical Management.

Authors:  Pasquale Plateroti; Andrea Maria Plateroti; Solmaz Abdolrahimzadeh; Gianluca Scuderi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.