Literature DB >> 23221877

Biodiversity technologies: tools as change agents.

Jake Snaddon1, Gillian Petrokofsky, Paul Jepson, Katherine J Willis.   

Abstract

A meeting on Biodiversity Technologies was held by the Biodiversity Institute, Oxford on the 27-28 of September 2012 at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. The symposium brought together 36 speakers from North America, Australia and across Europe, presenting the latest research on emerging technologies in biodiversity science and conservation. Here we present a perspective on the general trends emerging from the symposium.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221877      PMCID: PMC3565525          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  'Ecosystomics': ecology by sequencer.

Authors:  Anthony M Poole; Daniel B Stouffer; Jason M Tylianakis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Beyond data management: how ecoinformatics can benefit environmental monitoring programs.

Authors:  Stephen S Hale; Jeffrey W Hollister
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The case for cloud computing in genome informatics.

Authors:  Lincoln D Stein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  A call for an international network of genomic observatories (GOs).

Authors:  Neil Davies; Chris Meyer; Jack A Gilbert; Linda Amaral-Zettler; John Deck; Mesude Bicak; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna Assunta-Sansone; Kathy Willis; Dawn Field
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.524

  4 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive.

Authors:  Amber G F Teacher; David J Griffiths; David J Hodgson; Richard Inger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Data collection and storage in long-term ecological and evolutionary studies: The Mongoose 2000 system.

Authors:  Harry H Marshall; David J Griffiths; Francis Mwanguhya; Robert Businge; Amber G F Griffiths; Solomon Kyabulima; Kenneth Mwesige; Jennifer L Sanderson; Faye J Thompson; Emma I K Vitikainen; Michael A Cant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Deploying Acoustic Detection Algorithms on Low-Cost, Open-Source Acoustic Sensors for Environmental Monitoring.

Authors:  Peter Prince; Andrew Hill; Evelyn Piña Covarrubias; Patrick Doncaster; Jake L Snaddon; Alex Rogers
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  In Vitro Technology in Plant Conservation: Relevance to Biocultural Diversity.

Authors:  Verena Kulak; Sheri Longboat; Nicolas D Brunet; Mukund Shukla; Praveen Saxena
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12

5.  Identifying conservation technology needs, barriers, and opportunities.

Authors:  Nathan R Hahn; Sara P Bombaci; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A global community-sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology.

Authors:  Talia Speaker; Stephanie O'Donnell; George Wittemyer; Brett Bruyere; Colby Loucks; Anthony Dancer; Marianne Carter; Eric Fegraus; Jonathan Palmer; Ellie Warren; Jennifer Solomon
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 7.563

7.  Biological diversity in the patent system.

Authors:  Paul Oldham; Stephen Hall; Oscar Forero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scientific research on animal biodiversity is systematically biased towards vertebrates and temperate regions.

Authors:  Mark A Titley; Jake L Snaddon; Edgar C Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.