OBJECTIVES: Ritonavir, used at low doses as a boosting agent of other protease inhibitors (PIs), is known to be associated with metabolic complications and gastrointestinal disturbances. The rate of accumulation of ritonavir within cells is still debated due to scarce data and methodological limitations. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate intracellular ritonavir penetration when used with different boosted PIs in the clinical setting. METHODS: Patients administered with atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg, once daily), darunavir/ritonavir [600/100 mg, twice daily (darunavir-600) and 800/100 mg, once daily (darunavir-800)], lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg, twice daily) and tipranavir/ritonavir (500/200 mg, twice daily) were considered. Blood sampling at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough) was performed. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-associated and plasma ritonavir and PI concentrations were measured by validated HPLC methods. PBMC count and individual mean cell volume (MCV) were measured using a Coulter Counter instrument. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled. Frequencies of ritonavir-boosted PIs were atazanavir, 37%; darunavir-600, 23%; lopinavir, 19%; tipranavir, 13%; and darunavir-800, 8%. The median intracellular and plasma concentrations of ritonavir were 1279 ng/mL (IQR 727-2087) and 170 ng/mL (IQR 82-384), respectively, accounting for a cellular accumulation ratio of 7.69 (5.7-10.9). Significant differences in ritonavir intracellular concentrations emerged among different PIs (P<0.001): specifically between darunavir-600 and atazanavir (P<0.001), between darunavir-600 and tipranavir (P=0.009), between atazanavir and lopinavir (P<0.001) and between lopinavir and tipranavir (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a higher rate of ritonavir intracellular accumulation than previously reported, possibly due to the more accurate calculation of intracellular concentrations by MCV. The ratio varied according to concomitantly administered PIs, suggesting their influence on the rate of ritonavir intracellular penetration.
OBJECTIVES:Ritonavir, used at low doses as a boosting agent of other protease inhibitors (PIs), is known to be associated with metabolic complications and gastrointestinal disturbances. The rate of accumulation of ritonavir within cells is still debated due to scarce data and methodological limitations. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate intracellular ritonavir penetration when used with different boosted PIs in the clinical setting. METHODS:Patients administered with atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg, once daily), darunavir/ritonavir [600/100 mg, twice daily (darunavir-600) and 800/100 mg, once daily (darunavir-800)], lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg, twice daily) and tipranavir/ritonavir (500/200 mg, twice daily) were considered. Blood sampling at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough) was performed. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-associated and plasma ritonavir and PI concentrations were measured by validated HPLC methods. PBMC count and individual mean cell volume (MCV) were measured using a Coulter Counter instrument. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled. Frequencies of ritonavir-boosted PIs were atazanavir, 37%; darunavir-600, 23%; lopinavir, 19%; tipranavir, 13%; and darunavir-800, 8%. The median intracellular and plasma concentrations of ritonavir were 1279 ng/mL (IQR 727-2087) and 170 ng/mL (IQR 82-384), respectively, accounting for a cellular accumulation ratio of 7.69 (5.7-10.9). Significant differences in ritonavir intracellular concentrations emerged among different PIs (P<0.001): specifically between darunavir-600 and atazanavir (P<0.001), between darunavir-600 and tipranavir (P=0.009), between atazanavir and lopinavir (P<0.001) and between lopinavir and tipranavir (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a higher rate of ritonavir intracellular accumulation than previously reported, possibly due to the more accurate calculation of intracellular concentrations by MCV. The ratio varied according to concomitantly administered PIs, suggesting their influence on the rate of ritonavir intracellular penetration.
Authors: John C Kraft; Lisa A McConnachie; Josefin Koehn; Loren Kinman; Jianguo Sun; Ann C Collier; Carol Collins; Danny D Shen; Rodney J Y Ho Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Amedeo De Nicolò; Marco Simiele; Andrea Calcagno; Adnan Mohamed Abdi; Stefano Bonora; Giovanni Di Perri; Antonio D'Avolio Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Amedeo De Nicolò; Andrea Calcagno; Ilaria Motta; Elisa De Vivo; Antonio D'Avolio; Giovanni Di Perri; Lubbe Wiesner; Isma-Eel Ebrahim; Gary Maartens; Catherine Orrell; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Amedeo De Nicolò; Alice Ianniello; Micol Ferrara; Valeria Avataneo; Jessica Cusato; Miriam Antonucci; Elisa De Vivo; Catriona Waitt; Andrea Calcagno; Alice Trentalange; Giampiero Muccioli; Stefano Bonora; Giovanni Di Perri; Antonio D'Avolio Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2020-12-25