Literature DB >> 23221593

The influence of television advertisements on promoting calls to telephone quitlines.

Matthew Farrelly1, Nathan Mann, Kimberly Watson, Terry Pechacek.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the relative effectiveness of cessation, secondhand smoke and other tobacco control television advertisements in promoting quitlines in nine states from 2002 through 2005. Quarterly, the number of individuals who used quitlines per 10 000 adult smokers in a media market are measured. Negative binomial regression analysis was used to link caller rates to market-level exposure to tobacco control television advertisements overall and by message theme. The relationship between caller rates and advertising exposure was positive and statistically significant (P < 0.001). Advertisements that focus on promoting cessation (P < 0.001), highlighting the dangers of secondhand smoke (P = 0.037), and all other tobacco countermarketing advertisements (P = 0.027) were significantly associated with quitline caller rates. For every 10% increase in exposure to cessation, secondhand smoke and other tobacco countermarketing advertisements, caller rates increased by 1.1, 0.2 and 0.4%, respectively. Caller rates significantly increased in quarters when cigarette excise tax increased (P < 0.001) and when the percentage of the population covered by comprehensive smoke-free air laws increased (P = 0.022). Although advertisements promoting cessation are the most effective in driving quitline use, other topics, such as messages highlighting the dangers of secondhand smoke, also prompt their quitlines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221593     DOI: 10.1093/her/cys113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  8 in total

1.  Recall of anti-tobacco advertisements and effects on quitting behavior: results from the California smokers cohort.

Authors:  Eric C Leas; Mark G Myers; David R Strong; C Richard Hofstetter; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cessation Outcomes Among Quitline Callers in Three States During a National Tobacco Education Campaign.

Authors:  Katrina A Vickerman; Lei Zhang; Ann Malarcher; Paul Mowery; Chelsea Nash
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The impact of a state-sponsored mass media campaign on use of telephone quitline and web-based cessation services.

Authors:  Jennifer C Duke; Nathan Mann; Kevin C Davis; Anna MacMonegle; Jane Allen; Lauren Porter
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  How Tobacco Quitline Callers in 38 US States Reported Hearing About Quitline Services, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Gillian L Schauer; Ann Malarcher; Nathan Mann; Jesse Fabrikant; Lei Zhang; Stephen Babb
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Impact of a national tobacco education campaign on weekly numbers of quitline calls and website visitors--United States, March 4-June 23, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Assessing Audience Members' Ability to Identify the Media Source of a Health Campaign Disseminated via Different Media.

Authors:  Simone Pettigrew; Michelle Jongenelis; Fiona Phillips; Terry Slevin; Vanessa Allom; Stacey Keightley; Sarah Beasley
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-07-19

7.  Influence of new tobacco control policies and campaigns on Quitline call volume in Korea.

Authors:  Jinju Park; Luu Ngoc Minh; Sang Hwa Shin; Jin-Kyoung Oh; E Hwa Yun; Duckhyung Lee; Min Kyung Lim
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.600

8.  How does the emotive content of televised anti-smoking mass media campaigns influence monthly calls to the NHS Stop Smoking helpline in England?

Authors:  Sol Richardson; Tessa Langley; Lisa Szatkowski; Michelle Sims; Anna Gilmore; Ann McNeill; Sarah Lewis
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.018

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.