Literature DB >> 23221352

On the validity of 3D polymer gel dosimetry: III. MRI-related error sources.

Jan Vandecasteele1, Yves De Deene.   

Abstract

In MRI (PAGAT) polymer gel dosimetry, there exists some controversy on the validity of 3D dose verifications of clinical treatments. The relative contribution of important sources of uncertainty in MR scanning to the overall accuracy and precision of 3D MRI polymer gel dosimetry is quantified in this study. The performance in terms of signal-to-noise and imaging artefacts was evaluated on three different MR scanners (two 1.5 T and a 3 T scanner). These include: (1) B₀-field inhomogeneity, (2) B₁-field inhomogeneity, (3) dielectric effects (losses and standing waves) and (4) temperature inhomogeneity during scanning. B₀-field inhomogeneities that amount to maximum 5 ppm result in dose deviations of up to 4.3% and deformations of up to 5 pixels. Compensation methods are proposed. B₁-field inhomogeneities were found to induce R₂ variations in large anthropomorphic phantoms both at 1.5 and 3 T. At 1.5 T these effects are mainly caused by the coil geometry resulting in dose deviations of up to 25%. After the correction of the R₂ maps using a heuristic flip angle-R₂ relation, these dose deviations are reduced to 2.4%. At 3 T, the dielectric properties of the gel phantoms are shown to strongly influence B₁-field homogeneity, hence R₂ homogeneity, especially of large anthropomorphic phantoms. The low electrical conductivity of polymer gel dosimeters induces standing wave patterns resulting in dose deviations up to 50%. Increasing the conductivity of the gel by adding NaCl reduces the dose deviation to 25% after which the post-processing is successful in reducing the remaining inhomogeneities caused by the coil geometry to within 2.4%. The measurements are supported by computational modelling of the B₁-field. Finally, temperature fluctuations of 1 °C frequently encountered in clinical MRI scanners result in dose deviations up to 15%. It is illustrated that with adequate temperature stabilization, the dose uncertainty is reduced to within 2.58%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221352     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Influencing Factors on Reproducibility and Stability of MRI NIPAM Polymer Gel Dosimeter.

Authors:  Farideh Pak; Alireza Farajollahi; Ali Movafaghi; Alireza Naseri
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2013-07-14

2.  On the need for comprehensive validation of deformable image registration, investigated with a novel 3-dimensional deformable dosimeter.

Authors:  Titania Juang; Shiva Das; John Adamovics; Ron Benning; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiological properties of nanocomposite Fricke gel dosimeters for heavy ion beams.

Authors:  Takuya Maeyama; Nobuhisa Fukunishi; Kenichi L Ishikawa; Kazuaki Fukasaku; Shigekazu Fukuda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D.

Authors:  Yves De Deene
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of NIPAM Polymer Gel Dosimeters on Three Orthogonal Planes and Temporal Stability Analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Yuan Cheng; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Cheng-Ting Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Whole Three-Dimensional Dosimetry of Carbon Ion Beams with an MRI-Based Nanocomposite Fricke Gel Dosimeter Using Rapid T1 Mapping Method.

Authors:  Shinya Mizukami; Yusuke Watanabe; Takahiro Mizoguchi; Tsutomu Gomi; Hidetake Hara; Hideyuki Takei; Nobuhisa Fukunishi; Kenichi L Ishikawa; Shigekazu Fukuda; Takuya Maeyama
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2021-11-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.