PROBLEM: Community-engaged research (CEnR) is a complex, collaborative process that presents many challenges and requires investment of time and commitment by both community and university research partners. PURPOSE: This paper describes the experience of a group of university and community members developing a set of guidelines for the ethical conduct of CEnR projects. KEY POINTS: The paper outlines the process of guideline development and lessons learned from this collaborative effort, which was based upon approaches and methods of community-based participatory research (CBPR). CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines are included and may serve as a framework to be individualized by other partnerships. Our experience shows that the very process of review, revision, and engagement is extremely helpful in creating a framework that works for the specific communities and for establishing working relationships among the partners so that all stakeholders feel ownership and investment in the framework and the collaborative research efforts.
PROBLEM: Community-engaged research (CEnR) is a complex, collaborative process that presents many challenges and requires investment of time and commitment by both community and university research partners. PURPOSE: This paper describes the experience of a group of university and community members developing a set of guidelines for the ethical conduct of CEnR projects. KEY POINTS: The paper outlines the process of guideline development and lessons learned from this collaborative effort, which was based upon approaches and methods of community-based participatory research (CBPR). CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines are included and may serve as a framework to be individualized by other partnerships. Our experience shows that the very process of review, revision, and engagement is extremely helpful in creating a framework that works for the specific communities and for establishing working relationships among the partners so that all stakeholders feel ownership and investment in the framework and the collaborative research efforts.
Authors: Patricia A L Cochran; Catherine A Marshall; Carmen Garcia-Downing; Elizabeth Kendall; Doris Cook; Laurie McCubbin; Reva Mariah S Gover Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Keith C Norris; Rebecca Brusuelas; Loretta Jones; Jeanne Miranda; O Kenrik Duru; Carol M Mangione Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Roseanne Bilodeau; James Gilmore; Loretta Jones; Gloria Palmisano; Tinesha Banks; Barbara Tinney; Georgina I Lucas Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lainie Friedman Ross; Allan Loup; Robert M Nelson; Jeffrey R Botkin; Rhonda Kost; George R Smith; Sarah Gehlert Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Nancy S Redeker; Monica R Ordway; Nancy Banasiak; Barbara Caldwell; Craig Canapari; Angela Crowley; Ada Fenick; Sangchoon Jeon; Meghan O'Connell; Leslie Sude; Lois S Sadler Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Daniela B Friedman; Otis L Owens; Dawnyea D Jackson; Kim M Johnson; Lucy Gansauer; Joe Dickey; Ron Miller; Johnny Payne; James D Bearden; James R Hebert Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Rupa S Valdez; Sophie E Lyon; Claire Wellbeloved-Stone; Mary Collins; Courtney C Rogers; Kristine D Cantin-Garside; Diogo Gonclaves Fortes; Chung Kim; Shaalini S Desai; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Raja Kushalnagar Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Carolyn M Tucker; Guillermo M Wippold; Jaime L Williams; Tya M Arthur; Frederic F Desmond; Karlyne C Robinson Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2016-01-29
Authors: Sarah E Langdon; Shannon L Golden; Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; Rhonda F Maynor; Alfred Bryant; V Kay Freeman; Ronny A Bell Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2016-03-23
Authors: Kelly K O'Brien; Patricia Solomon; Catherine Worthington; Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco; Larry Baxter; Stephanie A Nixon; Rosalind Baltzer-Turje; Greg Robinson; Elisse Zack Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 5.428