BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Contact precautions are a cornerstone of infection prevention but have also been associated with less healthcare worker (HCW) contact and adverse events. We studied how contact precautions modified HCW behavior in 4 acute care facilities. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Four acute care facilities in the United States performing active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Trained observers performed "secret shopper" monitoring of HCW activities during routine care, using a standardized collection tool and fixed 1-hour observation periods. RESULTS: A total of 7,743 HCW visits were observed over 1,989 hours. Patients on contact precautions had 36.4% fewer hourly HCW visits than patients not on contact precautions (2.78 vs 4.37 visits per hour; [Formula: see text]) as well as 17.7% less direct patient contact time with HCWs (13.98 vs 16.98 minutes per hour; [Formula: see text]). Patients on contact precautions tended to have fewer visitors (23.6% fewer; [Formula: see text]). HCWs were more likely to perform hand hygiene on exiting the room of a patient on contact precautions (63.2% vs 47.4% in rooms of patients not on contact precautions; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION: Contact precautions were found to be associated with activities likely to reduce transmission of resistant pathogens, such as fewer visits and better hand hygiene at exit, while exposing patients on contact precautions to less HCW contact, less visitor contact, and potentially other unintended outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Contact precautions are a cornerstone of infection prevention but have also been associated with less healthcare worker (HCW) contact and adverse events. We studied how contact precautions modified HCW behavior in 4 acute care facilities. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Four acute care facilities in the United States performing active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Trained observers performed "secret shopper" monitoring of HCW activities during routine care, using a standardized collection tool and fixed 1-hour observation periods. RESULTS: A total of 7,743 HCW visits were observed over 1,989 hours. Patients on contact precautions had 36.4% fewer hourly HCW visits than patients not on contact precautions (2.78 vs 4.37 visits per hour; [Formula: see text]) as well as 17.7% less direct patient contact time with HCWs (13.98 vs 16.98 minutes per hour; [Formula: see text]). Patients on contact precautions tended to have fewer visitors (23.6% fewer; [Formula: see text]). HCWs were more likely to perform hand hygiene on exiting the room of a patient on contact precautions (63.2% vs 47.4% in rooms of patients not on contact precautions; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION: Contact precautions were found to be associated with activities likely to reduce transmission of resistant pathogens, such as fewer visits and better hand hygiene at exit, while exposing patients on contact precautions to less HCW contact, less visitor contact, and potentially other unintended outcomes.
Authors: Lindsay D Croft; Michael Liquori; James Ladd; Hannah Day; Lisa Pineles; Elizabeth Lamos; Ryan Arnold; Preeti Mehrotra; Jeffrey C Fink; Patricia Langenberg; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Eli Perencevich; Anthony D Harris; Daniel J Morgan Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Anna K Barker; Elise S Cowley; Linda McKinley; Marc-Oliver Wright; Nasia Safdar Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Richard E Nelson; Vanessa W Stevens; Karim Khader; Makoto Jones; Matthew H Samore; Martin E Evans; R Douglas Scott; Rachel B Slayton; Marin L Schweizer; Eli L Perencevich; Michael A Rubin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Preeti Mehrotra; Lindsay Croft; Hannah R Day; Eli N Perencevich; Lisa Pineles; Anthony D Harris; Saul N Weingart; Daniel J Morgan Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Franziska A Herbst; Maria Heckel; Johanna M Tiedtke; Thomas Adelhardt; Alexander Sturm; Stephanie Stiel; Christoph Ostgathe Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Anthony D Harris; Lisa Pineles; Beverly Belton; J Kristie Johnson; Michelle Shardell; Mark Loeb; Robin Newhouse; Louise Dembry; Barbara Braun; Eli N Perencevich; Kendall K Hall; Daniel J Morgan; Syed K Shahryar; Connie S Price; Joseph J Gadbaw; Marci Drees; Daniel H Kett; L Silvia Muñoz-Price; Jesse T Jacob; Loreen A Herwaldt; Carol A Sulis; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa Maragakis; Matthew E Lissauer; Marcus J Zervos; David K Warren; Robin L Carver; Deverick J Anderson; David P Calfee; Jason E Bowling; Nasia Safdar Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elise M Martin; Dana Russell; Zachary Rubin; Romney Humphries; Tristan R Grogan; David Elashoff; Daniel Z Uslan Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 3.254