Literature DB >> 23220492

Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of adult spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome.

Alberto Esquenazi1, Alberto Albanese, Michael B Chancellor, Elie Elovic, Karen R Segal, David M Simpson, Christopher P Smith, Anthony B Ward.   

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) can be injected to achieve therapeutic benefit across a large range of clinical conditions. To assess the efficacy and safety of BoNT injections for the treatment of spasticity associated with the upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS), an expert panel reviewed evidence from the published literature. Data sources included English-language studies identified via MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Evidence tables generated in the 2008 Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) review of the use of BoNT for autonomic disorders were also reviewed and updated. The panel evaluated evidence at several levels, supporting BoNT as a class, the serotypes BoNT-A and BoNT-B, as well as the four individual commercially available formulations: abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), and rimabotulinumtoxinB (B/Rima). The panel ultimately made recommendations on the effectiveness of BoNT for the management of spasticity, based upon the strength of clinical evidence and following the AAN classification scale. While the prior report by the AAN provided recommendations for the use of BoNT as a class of drug, this report provides more detail and includes recommendations for the individual formulations. For the treatment of upper limb spasticity, the evidence supported a Level A recommendation for BoNT-A, A/Abo, and A/Ona, with a Level B recommendation for A/Inco; there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for B/Rima. For lower limb spasticity, there was sufficient clinical evidence to support a Level A recommendation for A/Ona individually and BoNT-A in aggregate; the clinical evidence for A/Abo supported a Level C recommendation; and there was insufficient information to recommend A/Inco and B/Rima (Level U). There is a need for further comparative effectiveness studies of the available BoNT formulations for the management of spasticity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220492     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  36 in total

1.  Spastic Paralysis of the Elbow and Forearm.

Authors:  Idris Gharbaoui; Katarzyna Kania; Patrick Cole
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Spasticity treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A: data from a prospective German real-life patient registry.

Authors:  Axel Schramm; Jean-Pierre Ndayisaba; Matthias Auf dem Brinke; Martin Hecht; Christoph Herrmann; Martin Huber; Elmar Lobsien; Sabine Mehnert; Iris Reuter; Andrea Stenner; Christian van der Ven; Martin Winterholler; Andreas Kupsch; Joerg Wissel
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Botulinum Neurotoxins: Biology, Pharmacology, and Toxicology.

Authors:  Marco Pirazzini; Ornella Rossetto; Roberto Eleopra; Cesare Montecucco
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 4.  [Pain in patients with paraplegia].

Authors:  G Landmann; E-C Chang; W Dumat; A Lutz; R Müller; A Scheel-Sailer; K Schwerzmann; N Sigajew; A Ljutow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Botulinum Toxin Type A Improves Function According to Goal Attainment in Adults with Poststroke Lower Limb Spasticity in Real Life Practice.

Authors:  Lourdes López de Munain; Josep Valls-Solé; Irene Garcia Pascual; Pascal Maisonobe
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  [Treatment goals in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity following injection of botulinum toxin A : Results of the German-Austrian subgroup of the ULIS-II study].

Authors:  K Fheodoroff; D Dressler; H Woldag; P Koßmehl; M Koch; P Maisonobe; G Reichel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Benefits and Risks of Non-Approved Injection Regimens for Botulinum Toxins in Spasticity.

Authors:  Andrea Santamato; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Responsiveness to botulinum toxin type A in muscles of complex regional pain patients with tonic dystonia.

Authors:  Johanna C M Schilder; J Gert van Dijk; Dirk Dressler; Johannes H T M Koelman; Johan Marinus; Jacobus J van Hilten
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 9.  Relevance of sonography for botulinum toxin treatment of cervical dystonia: an expert statement.

Authors:  Axel Schramm; Tobias Bäumer; Urban Fietzek; Susanne Heitmann; Uwe Walter; Wolfgang H Jost
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 10.  Hemifacial spasm and neurovascular compression.

Authors:  Alex Y Lu; Jacky T Yeung; Jason L Gerrard; Elias M Michaelides; Raymond F Sekula; Ketan R Bulsara
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.