Literature DB >> 23220427

The properties of induced gamma oscillations in human visual cortex show individual variability in their dependence on stimulus size.

Gavin Perry1, Khalid Hamandi, Lisa M Brindley, Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy, Krish D Singh.   

Abstract

The role of gamma-band (typically 30-100 Hz) oscillations in visual processing is a topic of increasing interest. One hypothesis is that gamma oscillations reflect the action of GABAergic inhibitory processes in the visual cortex responsible for surround-suppression. Evidence from primate neurophysiology [Gieselmann & Thiele, A., 2008. European Journal of Neuroscience 28, 447-459.] suggests that the amplitude of the gamma-band response increases as a visual grating stimulus expands outside of the classical receptive field into the inhibitory surround; with the amplitude of the response increasing, and the frequency of the response decreasing, monotonically with stimulus size. In this study, we tested the relationship between the gamma-band response and the size of visual grating stimuli in humans using MEG. In two initial experiments we found that, while the absolute magnitude of the gamma-band response varied considerably across participants, in all cases the amplitude of the response had a monotonically increasing relationship with size. In contrast, we did not find any relationship between the frequency of the response and the size of the stimulus. Previously, the frequency of the visual gamma-band response has been found to correlate across individuals with the surface area of cortical area V1 [Schwarzkopf et al., 2012. Journal of Neuroscience 32, 1507-12.] We, however, were unable to find any correlation between the frequency or the magnitude of the gamma-band response and the dimensions of V1 cortical gray matter as measured from participants' MR images. Consistent with a saturation of the gamma-band response found for some individuals in the first two experiments, in a third experiment we found that the magnitude of the response to our largest stimulus (8°) was less than that predicted from the response to the stimulus' parts.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220427     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  tDCS Modulates Visual Gamma Oscillations and Basal Alpha Activity in Occipital Cortices: Evidence from MEG.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Surface color and predictability determine contextual modulation of V1 firing and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Alina Peter; Cem Uran; Pascal Fries; Martin Vinck; Johanna Klon-Lipok; Rasmus Roese; Sylvia van Stijn; William Barnes; Jarrod R Dowdall; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A new regime for highly robust gamma oscillation with co-exist of accurate and weak synchronization in excitatory-inhibitory networks.

Authors:  Zhijie Wang; Hong Fan; Fang Han
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Frequency of gamma oscillations in humans is modulated by velocity of visual motion.

Authors:  Elena V Orekhova; Anna V Butorina; Olga V Sysoeva; Andrey O Prokofyev; Anastasia Yu Nikolaeva; Tatiana A Stroganova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Structural and neurochemical correlates of individual differences in gamma frequency oscillations in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Siân E Robson; Suresh D Muthukumarawswamy; C John Evans; Alexander Shaw; Jennifer Brealy; Brittany Davis; Grainne McNamara; Gavin Perry; Krish D Singh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Differential impact of movement on the alpha and gamma dynamics serving visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Alex I Wiesman; Christine M Embury; Mikki Schantell; Timothy R Joe; Jacob A Eastman; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Functionally Distinct Gamma Range Activity Revealed by Stimulus Tuning in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Eleonora Bartoli; William Bosking; Yvonne Chen; Ye Li; Sameer A Sheth; Michael S Beauchamp; Daniel Yoshor; Brett L Foster
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Cognitive loading via mental arithmetic modulates effects of blink-related oscillations on precuneus and ventral attention network regions.

Authors:  Careesa C Liu; Sujoy Ghosh Hajra; Xiaowei Song; Sam M Doesburg; Teresa P L Cheung; Ryan C N D'Arcy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Linear tuning of gamma amplitude and frequency to luminance contrast: evidence from a continuous mapping paradigm.

Authors:  Gavin Perry; James M Randle; Loes Koelewijn; Bethany C Routley; Krish D Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Broadband cortical desynchronization underlies the human psychedelic state.

Authors:  Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Robin L Carhart-Harris; Rosalyn J Moran; Matthew J Brookes; Tim M Williams; David Errtizoe; Ben Sessa; Andreas Papadopoulos; Mark Bolstridge; Krish D Singh; Amanda Feilding; Karl J Friston; David J Nutt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.