Literature DB >> 23219997

Random forests-based differential analysis of gene sets for gene expression data.

Huey-Miin Hsueh1, Da-Wei Zhou, Chen-An Tsai.   

Abstract

In DNA microarray studies, gene-set analysis (GSA) has become the focus of gene expression data analysis. GSA utilizes the gene expression profiles of functionally related gene sets in Gene Ontology (GO) categories or priori-defined biological classes to assess the significance of gene sets associated with clinical outcomes or phenotypes. Many statistical approaches have been proposed to determine whether such functionally related gene sets express differentially (enrichment and/or deletion) in variations of phenotypes. However, little attention has been given to the discriminatory power of gene sets and classification of patients. In this study, we propose a method of gene set analysis, in which gene sets are used to develop classifications of patients based on the Random Forest (RF) algorithm. The corresponding empirical p-value of an observed out-of-bag (OOB) error rate of the classifier is introduced to identify differentially expressed gene sets using an adequate resampling method. In addition, we discuss the impacts and correlations of genes within each gene set based on the measures of variable importance in the RF algorithm. Significant classifications are reported and visualized together with the underlying gene sets and their contribution to the phenotypes of interest. Numerical studies using both synthesized data and a series of publicly available gene expression data sets are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. Compared with other hypothesis testing approaches, our proposed methods are reliable and successful in identifying enriched gene sets and in discovering the contributions of genes within a gene set. The classification results of identified gene sets can provide an valuable alternative to gene set testing to reveal the unknown, biologically relevant classes of samples or patients. In summary, our proposed method allows one to simultaneously assess the discriminatory ability of gene sets and the importance of genes for interpretation of data in complex biological systems. The classifications of biologically defined gene sets can reveal the underlying interactions of gene sets associated with the phenotypes, and provide an insightful complement to conventional gene set analyses.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219997     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  8 in total

1.  Molecular clustering based on gene set expression and its relationship with prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Baobao Xing; Lei Shi; Zhiguo Bao; Ying Liang; Bo Liu; Ruihan Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Machine learning approaches distinguish multiple stress conditions using stress-responsive genes and identify candidate genes for broad resistance in rice.

Authors:  Rafi Shaik; Wusirika Ramakrishna
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  GOexpress: an R/Bioconductor package for the identification and visualisation of robust gene ontology signatures through supervised learning of gene expression data.

Authors:  Kévin Rue-Albrecht; Paul A McGettigan; Belinda Hernández; Nicolas C Nalpas; David A Magee; Andrew C Parnell; Stephen V Gordon; David E MacHugh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Non-destructive monitoring of netted muskmelon quality based on its external phenotype using Random Forest.

Authors:  Liu Qian; Li Daren; Niu Qingliang; Huang Danfeng; Chang Liying
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  MAVTgsa: an R package for gene set (enrichment) analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Yi Chien; Ching-Wei Chang; Chen-An Tsai; James J Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Towards understanding the breast cancer epigenome: a comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data.

Authors:  Sandeep K Singhal; Nawaid Usmani; Stefan Michiels; Otto Metzger-Filho; Kamal S Saini; Olga Kovalchuk; Matthew Parliament
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-19

7.  Prognostic value of cancer antigen -125 for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis: A random survival forest prognostic model.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Liuhai Shen; Jianhua Geng; Yitian Wu; Huan Xiao; Fan Zhang; Hongwei Si
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  binomialRF: interpretable combinatoric efficiency of random forests to identify biomarker interactions.

Authors:  Samir Rachid Zaim; Colleen Kenost; Joanne Berghout; Wesley Chiu; Liam Wilson; Hao Helen Zhang; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.