PURPOSE: To correlate radiotherapy (RT) dose to acute esophagitis (AE) by means of FDG-PET scans acquired after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with 24 × 2.75 Gy were selected on presence of a post-RT PET (PET(post)) scan acquired within 3 months after cCRT. The value of PET(post) in relation to AE was evaluated by comparing the mean esophageal SUV of the highest 50% (mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket) between gr < 2 and gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose on the esophagus wall was correlated to the SUV and modeled using a power-law fit. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model was used to predict gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose-response relation was used in the LKB model to calculate the EUD. Resulting prediction accuracy was compared to D(mean), V(35), V(55) and V(60). RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (gr < 2 = 25, gr ≥ 2=57). The mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket ≥ was significantly higher for gr ≥ 2AE (2.2 vs. 2.6, p < 0.01). The LKB parameters (95% CI) were n = 0.130 (0.120-0.141), m = 0.25 (0.13-0.85) and TD(50) = 50.4 Gy (37.5-55.4), which resulted in improved predictability of AE compared to other predictors. CONCLUSION: Esophageal uptake of FDG post-cCRT reflects AE severity. Predictability of grade ≥ 2AE was improved by using the local dose-SUV response model, with narrow confidence intervals for the optimized LKB parameters.
PURPOSE: To correlate radiotherapy (RT) dose to acute esophagitis (AE) by means of FDG-PET scans acquired after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients treated with 24 × 2.75 Gy were selected on presence of a post-RT PET (PET(post)) scan acquired within 3 months after cCRT. The value of PET(post) in relation to AE was evaluated by comparing the mean esophageal SUV of the highest 50% (mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket) between gr < 2 and gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose on the esophagus wall was correlated to the SUV and modeled using a power-law fit. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model was used to predict gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose-response relation was used in the LKB model to calculate the EUD. Resulting prediction accuracy was compared to D(mean), V(35), V(55) and V(60). RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (gr < 2 = 25, gr ≥ 2=57). The mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket ≥ was significantly higher for gr ≥ 2AE (2.2 vs. 2.6, p < 0.01). The LKB parameters (95% CI) were n = 0.130 (0.120-0.141), m = 0.25 (0.13-0.85) and TD(50) = 50.4 Gy (37.5-55.4), which resulted in improved predictability of AE compared to other predictors. CONCLUSION: Esophageal uptake of FDG post-cCRT reflects AE severity. Predictability of grade ≥ 2AE was improved by using the local dose-SUV response model, with narrow confidence intervals for the optimized LKB parameters.
Authors: Sophie E Vollenbrock; Francine E M Voncken; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Maarten L Donswijk; Erik Vegt; Leon C Ter Beek; Jolanda M van Dieren; Johanna W van Sandick; Berthe M P Aleman; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Joshua S Niedzielski; Jinzhong Yang; Zhongxing Liao; Daniel R Gomez; Francesco Stingo; Radhe Mohan; Mary K Martel; Tina M Briere; Laurence E Court Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Francine E M Voncken; Berthe M P Aleman; Jolanda M van Dieren; Cecile Grootscholten; Ferry Lalezari; Johanna W van Sandick; Jeffrey D Steinberg; Erik Vegt Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Sadegh R Alam; Pengpeng Zhang; Si-Yuan Zhang; Ishita Chen; Andreas Rimner; Neelam Tyagi; Yu-Chi Hu; Wei Lu; Ellen D Yorke; Joseph O Deasy; Maria Thor Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Shuanghu Tiger Yuan; Richard K J Brown; Lujun Zhao; Randall K ten Haken; Milton Gross; Kemp B Cease; Matt Schipper; Paul Stanton; Jinming Yu; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Pouya Jelvehgaran; Jeffrey D Steinberg; Artem Khmelinskii; Gerben Borst; Ji-Ying Song; Niels de Wit; Daniel M de Bruin; Marcel van Herk Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Pouya Jelvehgaran; Daniel M de Bruin; Artem Khmelinskii; Gerben Borst; Jeffrey D Steinberg; Ji-Ying Song; Judith de Vos; Ton G van Leeuwen; Tanja Alderliesten; Johannes F de Boer; Marcel van Herk Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Samantha Warren; Mike Partridge; Rhys Carrington; Chris Hurt; Thomas Crosby; Maria A Hawkins Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038