Literature DB >> 23219459

Lumbar stiffness as a collateral outcome of spinal arthrodesis: a preliminary clinical study.

Robert A Hart1, Stephan L Pro, Kenneth R Gundle, Lynn M Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although spinal arthrodesis can improve function by correcting deformity and reducing pain, it also by intention reduces spinal mobility. Increased spinal stiffness may have the potential to impair function and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), independent of pain levels.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability to discriminate spinal stiffness from pain in ADLs after lumbar spine arthrodesis using two outcome instruments. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), radiographs.
METHODS: We developed the LSDI questionnaire to assess the impact of spinal stiffness on ability to perform different ADLs. The LSDI and ODI were administered to 93 patients who underwent lumbar arthrodesis extending from one to five or more motion segments at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Comparisons of mean LSDI and ODI scores between patients were made using generalized linear regression. A Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was computed to determine the relationship between the LSDI and ODI scores.
RESULTS: The sample included 61 women and 32 men, with mean age at surgery of 55.0 years (standard deviation [SD], 13.1) and mean time since surgery of 3.4 years (SD, 1.8). The mean LSDI score was 29.6 (SD, 19.2), and the mean ODI score was 39.7 (SD, 19.1). Comparing one-level and five-level arthrodesis, the LSDI scores were significantly different (p=.05), whereas the ODI scores were not significantly different (p=.36). Comparisons between other levels of arthrodesis did not show significant differences for either the LSDI or the ODI. Within the entire study group, LSDI and ODI scores were positively correlated (r=0.69, p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty in performing certain ADLs increases for patients with multilevel lumbar fusions as opposed to one-level arthrodesis. The LSDI distinguishes functional difficulties with ADLs accruing because of spinal stiffness, which appear to be independent of the functional limitations resulting from low back pain as measured by ODI.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219459     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  6 in total

1.  Comparison between Dynamic Stabilization and Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Lei Luo; Liehua Liu; Pei Li; Chen Zhao; Lichuan Liang; Fei Luo; Qiang Zhou; Yanhong Chen; Lang Fang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.667

2.  Back Stiffness Is Associated with Physical Health and Low Back Pain-Related Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Gregory Evan Hicks
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  CORR Insights®: The Dubousset Functional Test is a Novel Assessment of Physical Function and Balance.

Authors:  Walter F Krengel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Self-reports vs. physical measures of spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Jonas Nielsen; Casper Glissmann Nim; Søren O'Neill; Eleanor Boyle; Jan Hartvigsen; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Sexual and Reproductive Function in Spinal Cord Injury and Spinal Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Theodore H Albright; Zachary Grabel; J Mason DePasse; Mark A Palumbo; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-09-28

6.  Short-segment decompression/fusion versus long-segment decompression/fusion and osteotomy for Lenke-Silva type VI adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Hao-Cong Zhang; Hai-Long Yu; Hui-Feng Yang; Peng-Fei Sun; Hao-Tian Wu; Yang Zhan; Zheng Wang; Liang-Bi Xiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.