Literature DB >> 23219117

Effects of different strategies for feeding supplements on milk production responses in cows grazing a restricted pasture allowance.

M J Auldist1, L C Marett, J S Greenwood, M Hannah, J L Jacobs, W J Wales.   

Abstract

Milk production responses of grazing cows offered supplements in different ways were measured. Holstein-Friesian cows, averaging 227 d in milk, were allocated into 6 groups of 36, with 2 groups randomly assigned to each of 3 feeding strategies: (1) cows grazed perennial ryegrass pasture supplemented with milled barley grain fed in the milking parlor and pasture silage offered in the paddock (control); (2) same pasture and allotment supplemented with the same amounts of milled barley grain and pasture silage, but presented as a mixed ration after each milking (PMR 1); and (3) same pasture and allotment, supplemented with a mixed ration of milled barley grain, alfalfa hay, corn silage, and crushed corn grain (PMR 2). For all strategies, supplements provided the same metabolizable energy and grain:forage ratio. [75:25, dry matter (DM) basis]. Each group of 36 cows was further allocated into 4 groups of 9, which were assigned to receive 6, 8, 10, or 12 kg of supplement DM/cow per day. Thus, there were 2 replicated groups per supplement amount per dietary strategy. The experiment had a 14-d adaptation period and an 11-d measurement period. Pasture allotment was approximately 14 kg of DM/d for all cows and was offered in addition to the supplement. Positive quadratic responses to increasing amounts of supplement were observed for yield of milk, energy-corrected milk (ECM), and fat and protein, and positive linear responses for concentrations of fat and protein for cows on all 3 supplement feeding strategies. No difference existed between feeding strategy groups in yield of milk, ECM, or protein at any amount of supplement offered, but yield and concentration of fat was higher in PMR 2 cows compared with control and PMR 1 cows at the highest amounts of supplementation. Responses in marginal ECM production per additional kilogram of supplement were also greater for PMR 2 than control and PMR 1 cows when large amounts of supplement were consumed. For all diets, marked daily variation occurred in ruminal fluid volatile fatty acids and pH, especially in cows fed the largest amounts of supplement. It was concluded that when supplements are fed to grazing dairy cows, a simple mix of grain and pasture silage has no benefit over traditional strategies of feeding grain in the parlor and forage in the paddock. However, yield of milk fat and marginal milk production responses can be greater if the strategy uses an isoenergetic ration that also contains alfalfa hay, corn silage, and corn grain.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219117     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Performance of small-scale dairy farms in the highlands of central Mexico during the dry season under traditional feeding strategies.

Authors:  Carlos Galdino Martínez-García; Adolfo Armando Rayas-Amor; Juan Pablo Anaya-Ortega; Francisco Ernesto Martínez-Castañeda; Angélica Espinoza-Ortega; Fernando Prospero-Bernal; Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Supplementation with Ca salts of soybean oil interacts with concentrate level in grazing dairy cows: milk production and milk composition.

Authors:  Fernanda Lopes Macedo; Jonas de Souza; Fernanda Batistel; Lucas Jado Chagas; Flávio Augusto Portela Santos
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Identification of Factors Influencing Milking Frequency of Cows in Automatic Milking Systems Combined with Grazing.

Authors:  Françoise Lessire; Nassim Moula; Jean-Luc Hornick; Isabelle Dufrasne
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.