Literature DB >> 23218702

Outcome analysis of intracorneal ring segments for the treatment of keratoconus based on visual, refractive, and aberrometric impairment.

Alfredo Vega-Estrada1, Jorge L Alio, Luis F Brenner, Jaime Javaloy, Ana Belen Plaza Puche, Rafael I Barraquer, Miguel A Teus, Joaquim Murta, Jorge Henriques, Antonio Uceda-Montanes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation for the treatment of keratoconus based on preoperative visual impairment.
DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study.
METHODS: A total of 611 eyes of 361 keratoconic patients were evaluated. Subjects were classified according to their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) into 5 different groups: grade I, CDVA of 0.90 or better; grade II, CDVA equal to or better than 0.60 and worse than 0.90; grade III, CDVA equal to or better than 0.40 and worse than 0.60; grade IV, CDVA equal to or better than 0.20 and worse than 0.40; and grade plus, CDVA worse than 0.20. Success and failure indices were defined based on visual, refractive, corneal topographic, and aberrometric data and evaluated in each group 6 months after ICRS implantation.
RESULTS: Significant improvement after the procedure was observed regarding uncorrected distance visual acuity in all grades (P < .05). CDVA significantly decreased in grade I (P < .01) but significantly increased in all other grades (P < .05). A total of 37.9% of patients with preoperative CDVA 0.6 or better gained 1 or more lines of CDVA, whereas 82.8% of patients with preoperative CDVA 0.4 or worse gained 1 or more lines of CDVA (P < .01). Spherical equivalent and keratometry readings showed a significant reduction in all grades (P ≤ .02). Corneal higher-order aberrations did not change after the procedure (P ≥ .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on preoperative visual impairment, ICRS implantation provides significantly better results in patients with a severe form of the disease. A notable loss of CDVA lines can be expected in patients with a milder form of keratoconus.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218702     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  25 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after implantation of a new intrastromal corneal ring with 140-degree of arc in patients with corneal ectasia.

Authors:  Jordana Sandes; Larissa R S Stival; Marcos Pereira de Ávila; Paulo Ferrara; Guilherme Ferrara; Leopoldo Magacho; Luana P N Araújo; Leonardo Torquetti
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Keraring implantation using the Zeiss Visumax femtosecond laser in the management of patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  C L Wilde; S G Naylor; Z Varga; A Morrell; J L Ball
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Benefits of using corneal topography to choose subjective refraction technique in keratoconus (RE-CON): a prospective comparative crossover clinical study.

Authors:  Margaux Metzger; Valentin Navel; Jean-Vincent Barrière; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Jérémy Hébraud; Aurélien Mulliez; Laurence Béral; Frédéric Chiambaretta; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effect of intracorneal ring segment implantation on corneal asphericity.

Authors:  Canan A Utine; Ziya Ayhan; Ceren Durmaz Engin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Investigation of the efficiency of intrastromal ring segments with cross-linking using different sequence and timing for keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuan-Li Liu; Ping-Hua Li; Pierre Fournie; François Malecaze
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Geometrical custom modeling of human cornea in vivo and its use for the diagnosis of corneal ectasia.

Authors:  Francisco Cavas-Martínez; Daniel G Fernández-Pacheco; Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez; José Nieto Martínez; Francisco J Fernández Cañavate; Alfredo Vega-Estrada; Ana B Plaza-Puche; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus.

Authors:  Alfredo Vega-Estrada; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-15

Review 9.  Keratoconus Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Konstantinos D Andreanos; Kate Hashemi; Myrsini Petrelli; Konstantinos Droutsas; Ilias Georgalas; George D Kymionis
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 10.  Intrastromal corneal ring segments: how successful is the surgical treatment of keratoconus?

Authors:  Jorge L Alio; Alfredo Vega-Estrada; Santiago Esperanza; Rafael I Barraquer; Miguel A Teus; Joaquim Murta
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.