Literature DB >> 23218465

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: recommendations for practice based on a multidisciplinary review including cost-effectiveness and ethical and organizational issues.

Lucy J Boothroyd1, Marco Spaziano, Jason R Guertin, Laurie J Lambert, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Nicolas Noiseux, Michel Nguyen, Éric Dumont, Michel Carrier, Benoit de Varennes, Reda Ibrahim, Giuseppe Martucci, Yongling Xiao, Jean E Morin, Peter Bogaty.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a relatively new technology for the treatment of severe and symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. TAVI offers an alternative therapy for patients unable to be treated surgically because of contraindications or severe comorbidities. It is being rapidly dispersed in Canada, as it is worldwide. The objective of this article is to present our recommendations for the use of TAVI, based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of recently published evidence. We systematically searched and summarized published data (2008-2011) on benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of TAVI. We also examined ethical issues and organizational aspects of delivering the intervention. We discussed the soundness and applicability of our recommendations with clinical experts active in the field. The published TAVI results for high-risk and/or inoperable patients are promising in terms of survival, function, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness, although we noted large variability in the survival rates at 1 year and in the frequency of important adverse outcomes such as stroke. Until more data from randomized controlled trials and registries become available, prudence and discernment are necessary in the choice of patients most likely to benefit. Patients need to be well-informed about gaps in the evidence base. Our recommendations support the use of TAVI in the context of strict conditions with respect to patient eligibility, the patient selection process, organizational requirements, and the tracking of patient outcomes with a mandatory registry.
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218465     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  6 in total

1.  Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fenton H McCarthy; Danielle C Savino; Chase R Brown; Joseph E Bavaria; Vinay Kini; Danielle D Spragan; Taylor R Dibble; Howard C Herrmann; Saif Anwaruddin; Jay Giri; Wilson Y Szeto; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Imaging for approach selection of TAVI: assessment of the aorto-iliac tract diameter by computed tomography-angiography versus projection angiography.

Authors:  E M A Wiegerinck; H A Marquering; N Y Oldenburger; M A Elattar; R N Planken; B A J M De Mol; J J Piek; J Baan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Health Literacy in the Context of Implant Care-Perspectives of (Prospective) Implant Wearers on Individual and Organisational Factors.

Authors:  Constanze Hübner; Mariya Lorke; Annika Buchholz; Stefanie Frech; Laura Harzheim; Sabine Schulz; Saskia Jünger; Christiane Woopen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  [Overtreatment in intensive care medicine-recognition, designation, and avoidance : Position paper of the Ethics Section of the DIVI and the Ethics section of the DGIIN].

Authors:  Andrej Michalsen; Gerald Neitzke; Jochen Dutzmann; Annette Rogge; Anna-Henrikje Seidlein; Susanne Jöbges; Hilmar Burchardi; Christiane Hartog; Friedemann Nauck; Fred Salomon; Gunnar Duttge; Guido Michels; Kathrin Knochel; Stefan Meier; Peter Gretenkort; Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Impact of age on transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes: a comparison of patients aged ≤ 80 years versus patients > 80 years.

Authors:  Frank van der Kley; Philippe J van Rosendael; Spyridon Katsanos; Vasileios Kamperidis; Nina A Marsan; Ioannis Karalis; Arend de Weger; Meindert Palmen; Jeroen J Bax; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline A Kim; Suraj P Rasania; Jonathan Afilalo; Jeffrey J Popma; Lewis A Lipsitz; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.