Literature DB >> 23218442

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: is the technology ready to be the standard of care?

Nicholas G Zaorsky1, Matthew T Studenski, Adam P Dicker, Leonard Gomella, Robert B Den.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent solid tumor diagnosed in men in the United States and Western Europe. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is touted as a superior type of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the treatment of various tumors. SBRT developed from the theory that high doses of radiation from brachytherapy implant seeds could be recapitulated from advanced technology of radiation treatment planning and delivery. Moreover, SBRT has been theorized to be advantageous compared to other RT techniques because it has a treatment course shorter than that of conventionally fractionated EBRT (a single session, five days per week, for about two weeks vs. eight weeks), is non-invasive, is more effective at killing tumor cells, and is less likely to cause damage to normal tissue. In areas of the US and Europe where there is limited access to RT centers, SBRT is frequently being used to treat prostate cancer, even though long-term data about its efficacy and safety are not well established. We review the impetus behind SBRT and the current clinical evidence supporting its use for prostate cancer, thus providing oncologists and primary care physicians with an understanding of the continually evolving field of prostate radiation therapy. Studies of SBRT provide encouraging results of biochemical control and late toxicity. However, they are limited by a number of factors, including short follow-up, exclusion of intermediate- and high-risk patients, and relatively small number of patients treated. Currently, SBRT regimens should only be used in the context of clinical trials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218442     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  13 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: comparison of toxicity.

Authors:  James B Yu; Laura D Cramer; Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Arnold L Potosky; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prostate Cancer Patients With Unmanaged Diabetes or Receiving Insulin Experience Inferior Outcomes and Toxicities After Treatment With Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Talha Shaikh; Karen Ruth; Pankaj Sharda; Shelly B Hayes; Mark L Sobczak; Mark A Hallman; Marc C Smaldone; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 5.  Systematic review of hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Nitin Ohri; Timothy N Showalter; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy in low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Maurizio Valeriani; Alessia Carnevale; Linda Agolli; Paolo Bonome; Adelaide Montalto; Luca Nicosia; Mattia F Osti; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Giuseppe Minniti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 8.  Hypofractionation in prostate cancer: radiobiological basis and clinical appliance.

Authors:  M Mangoni; I Desideri; B Detti; P Bonomo; D Greto; F Paiar; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; S Scoccianti; T Masoni; C Ciabatti; A Turkaj; S Serni; A Minervini; M Gacci; M Carini; L Livi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  A comparison of robotic arm versus gantry linear accelerator stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Avkshtol; Yanqun Dong; Shelly B Hayes; Mark A Hallman; Robert A Price; Mark L Sobczak; Eric M Horwitz; Nicholas G Zaorsky
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  SHARP hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is well tolerated in prostate cancer : Toxicity and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Monika Rucinska; Anna Kieszkowska-Grudny; Sergiusz Nawrocki
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.