Literature DB >> 23218218

Reduced activation of left orbitofrontal cortex precedes blocked vocalization: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Paul F Sowman1, Stephen Crain, Elisabeth Harrison, Blake W Johnson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: While stuttering is known to be characterized by anomalous brain activations during speech, very little data is available describing brain activations during stuttering. To our knowledge there are no reports describing brain activations that precede blocking. In this case report we present magnetoencephalographic data from a person who stutters who had significant instances of blocking whilst performing a vowel production task. This unique data set has allowed us to compare the brain activations leading up to a block with those leading up to successful production. Surprisingly, the results are very consistent with data comparing fluent production in stutterers to controls. We show here that preceding a block there is significantly less activation of the left orbitofrontal and inferiorfrontal cortices. Furthermore, there is significant extra activation in the right orbitofrontal and inferiorfrontal cortices, and the sensorimotor and auditory areas bilaterally. This data adds weight to the argument forwarded by Kell et al. (2009) that the best functional sign of optimal repair in stutterering is activation of the left BA 47/12 in the orbitofrontal cortex. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: At the end of this activity the reader will be able to (a) identify brain regions associated with blocked vocalization, (b) discuss the functions of the orbitofrontal and inferior frontal cortices in regard to speech production and (c) describe the usefulness and limitations of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in stuttering research.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in neural regions functionally related to real and imagined stuttering.

Authors:  Nicholas F Wymbs; Roger J Ingham; Janis C Ingham; Katherine E Paolini; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Lateralization of brain activation in fluent and non-fluent preschool children: a magnetoencephalographic study of picture-naming.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Stephen Crain; Elisabeth Harrison; Blake W Johnson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Sensorimotor Oscillations Prior to Speech Onset Reflect Altered Motor Networks in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Mersov; Cecilia Jobst; Douglas O Cheyne; Luc De Nil
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Cortical dynamics of disfluency in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; Shalin Shah; Torrey M J Loucks; Kristin Pelczarski; J Scott Yaruss; Katie Gore; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-05

5.  Separation of trait and state in stuttering.

Authors:  Emily L Connally; David Ward; Christos Pliatsikas; Sarah Finnegan; Mark Jenkinson; Rowan Boyles; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging evidence for a deficit in brain timing networks in stuttering: a hypothesis and theory.

Authors:  Andrew C Etchell; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Decreased Cerebellar-Orbitofrontal Connectivity Correlates with Stuttering Severity: Whole-Brain Functional and Structural Connectivity Associations with Persistent Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Kevin R Sitek; Shanqing Cai; Deryk S Beal; Joseph S Perkell; Frank H Guenther; Satrajit S Ghosh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.