Literature DB >> 23218210

Avoidance of eye gaze by adults who stutter.

Robyn Lowe1, Adam J Guastella, Nigel T M Chen, Ross G Menzies, Ann Packman, Sue O'Brian, Mark Onslow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adults who stutter are at significant risk of developing social phobia. Cognitive theorists argue that a critical factor maintaining social anxiety is avoidance of social information. This avoidance may impair access to positive feedback from social encounters that could disconfirm fears and negative beliefs. Adults who stutter are known to engage in avoidance behaviours, and may neglect positive social information. This study investigated the gaze behaviour of adults who stutter whilst giving a speech.
METHOD: 16 adults who stutter and 16 matched controls delivered a 3-min speech to a television display of a pre-recorded lecture theatre audience. Participants were told the audience was watching them live from another room. Audience members were trained to display positive, negative and neutral expressions. Participant eye movement was recorded with an eye-tracker.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the stuttering and control participants for fixation duration and fixation count towards an audience display. In particular, the stuttering participants, compared to controls, looked for shorter time at positive audience members than at negative and neutral audience members and the background.
CONCLUSIONS: Adults who stutter may neglect positive social cues within social situations that could serve to disconfirm negative beliefs and fears. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: The reader will be able to: (a) describe the nature of anxiety experienced by adults who stutter; (b) identify the most common anxiety condition among adults who stutter; (c) understand how information processing biases and the use of safety behaviours contribute to the maintenance of social anxiety; (d) describe how avoiding social information may contribute to the maintenance of social anxiety in people who stutter; and (e) describe the clinical implications of avoidance of social information in people who stutter.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218210     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  7 in total

1.  "Not Unless It's a Life or Death Thing": A Qualitative Study of the Health Care Experiences of Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Hector R Perez; Camilo Doig-Acuña; Joanna L Starrels
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Speech and Anxiety Management With Persistent Stuttering: Current Status and Essential Research.

Authors:  Robyn Lowe; Ross Menzies; Mark Onslow; Ann Packman; Sue O'Brian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Cognitive bias modification for social anxiety in adults who stutter: a feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan McAllister; Sally Gascoine; Amy Carroll; Kate Humby; Mary Kingston; Lee Shepstone; Helen Risebro; Bundy Mackintosh; Tammy Davidson Thompson; Jo Hodgekins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Depression-related difficulties disengaging from negative faces are associated with sustained attention to negative feedback during social evaluation and predict stress recovery.

Authors:  Alvaro Sanchez; Nuria Romero; Rudi De Raedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Treating Social Anxiety: A Scoping Review of Treatment Designs and Adaptation to Stuttering.

Authors:  Ian Chard; Nejra van Zalk
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-02-25

6.  Green tea consumption and the management of adrenal stress hormones in adolescents who stutter.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almudhi; Sami A Gabr
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Biased saccadic responses to emotional stimuli in anxiety: an antisaccade study.

Authors:  Nigel T M Chen; Patrick J F Clarke; Tamara L Watson; Colin Macleod; Adam J Guastella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.