Literature DB >> 23217466

Ultrasound imagery for dental implant diagnosis and treatment planning in a porcine model.

Mijin Choi1, Martin O Culjat, Rahul S Singh, Shane N White.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Currently, there is no commercially available method to provide non-invasive, non-ionizing, real-time imaging of the gingival form and bony architecture of implant sites, before, during, and after implant placement.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of 2-dimensional (2-D) ultrasound imaging of soft and hard tissues for implant diagnosis and treatment planning.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sector scanning ultrasound system was applied. Five representative clinical features (implant in an edentulous ridge, single implant tooth replacement, implant dehiscence, tooth dehiscence, and mental foramina) were created or identified in each of the 5 porcine jaws, which were then covered with soft tissue and imaged in an acoustic water tank.
RESULTS: All of the 5 model features, in all 5 jaws, were clearly visible with the ultrasound. Most objects were visible over a large range of positions and angles. Each of the features, as well as the soft tissue and bone surfaces, were recognized by specific acoustic signatures, with the same signature recurring for each object type among all 5 of the jaw specimens. All implants were highly reflective and clearly visualized.
CONCLUSIONS: A 2-D sector scanning ultrasound system was demonstrated to be capable of imaging representative features for implant treatment planning in a porcine model; these included implants placed in edentulous ridges; implants placed for single tooth replacement; implants with simulated dehiscences; teeth with simulated dehiscences; and mental foramina. Specific acoustic signatures for these features were defined. Qualitative differences between ultrasound and other dental imaging techniques were described.
Copyright © 2012 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23217466     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60190-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

1.  Visibility of dental pulp spaces in dental ultrasound.

Authors:  K T Szopinski; P Regulski
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of intra-osseous cavity: A preliminary study in pig mandibles.

Authors:  Thásia L D Ferreira; Andre Luiz F Costa; Maria José A Tucunduva; Raul R Tucunduva-Neto; Elio H Shinohara; Cláudio F de Freitas
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2016-10-15

3.  Towards a bimodal proximity sensor for in situ neurovascular bundle detection during dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Jessie R Weber; François Baribeau; Paul Grenier; Frédéric Emond; Sylvain Dubois; François Duchesne; Marc Girard; Timothy Pope; Pascal Gallant; Ozzy Mermut; Hassan Ghaderi Moghadam
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Ultrasonographically locating the mental foramen and its soft tissue relations.

Authors:  Abdullah E Laher; Mike Wells
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.

Authors:  Yanhua Lan; Xiaoyuan Huang; Mingxing Fan; Huazhen Yu; Zhijian Xie; Yiqun Zhou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  High-Frequency Ultrasound for Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Thickness.

Authors:  Juliana Marotti; Sarah Neuhaus; Daniel Habor; Lauren Bohner; Stefan Heger; Klaus Radermacher; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Comparison of ultrasound imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for examination of the alveolar bone level: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kim-Cuong T Nguyen; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Neelambar R Kaipatur; June Cheung; Paul W Major; Lawrence H Le
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.