Plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity in Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively healthy elderly subjects: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is a circulating enzyme with pro-inflammatory and oxidative activities associated with cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke. While high plasma Lp-PLA2 activity was reported as a risk factor for dementia in the Rotterdam study, no association between Lp-PLA2 mass and dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD) was detected in the Framingham study. The objectives of the current study were to explore the relationship of plasma Lp-PLA2 activity with cognitive diagnoses (AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and cognitively healthy subjects), cardiovascular markers, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of AD, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype.
METHODS: Subjects with mild AD (n = 78) and aMCI (n = 59) were recruited from the Memory Clinic, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; cognitively healthy subjects (n = 66) were recruited from the community. Subjects underwent standardised medical, neurological, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, blood and CSF evaluation. Differences in Lp-PLA2 activity between the cognitive diagnosis groups were tested with ANOVA and in multiple linear regression models with adjustment for covariates. Associations between Lp-PLA2 and markers of cardiovascular disease and AD were explored with Spearman's correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in plasma Lp-PLA2 activity between AD (197.1 (standard deviation, SD 38.4) nmol/min/ml) and controls (195.4 (SD 41.9)). Gender, statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were independently associated with Lp-PLA2 activity in multiple regression models. Lp-PLA2 activity was correlated with LDL and inversely correlated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL). AD subjects with APOE-ε4 had higher Lp-PLA2 activity (207.9 (SD 41.2)) than AD subjects lacking APOE-ε4 (181.6 (SD 26.0), P = 0.003) although this was attenuated by adjustment for LDL (P = 0.09). No strong correlations were detected for Lp-PLA2 activity and CSF markers of AD.
CONCLUSION: Plasma Lp-PLA2 was not associated with a diagnosis of AD or aMCI in this cross-sectional study. The main clinical correlates of Lp-PLA2 activity in AD, aMCI and cognitively healthy subjects were variables associated with lipid metabolism.

Introduction

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), also known as platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), is a circulating enzyme with pro-inflammatory and oxidative activities studied extensively as a marker of cardiovascular risk [1-3]. LpPLA2 is measured through assay of either enzyme concentration in the serum (mass) or enzymatic activity [3]. While other cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes, may increase the risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) [4], there is limited published epidemiological data regarding the relationship between Lp-PLA2 activity and dementia. Individuals aged ≥ 55 years old within the highest quartile of Lp-PLA2 activity had an increased risk of developing dementia over a mean follow-up of 5.7 years in the Rotterdam case-cohort study (HR 1.56; CI 1.03 to 2.37); the effect was greater on vascular dementia (HR 2.19, CI 0.80 to 6.03) than for the AD outcome (HR 1.30, CI 0.82 to 2.04) [5]. Lp-PLA2 mass (measured as a one standard deviation increase above mean) was not found to be associated with an increased risk of dementia (HR 0.98; CI 0.84 to 1.15) or AD (HR 0.98; CI 0.82 to 1.18) in the Framingham Study, however [6]. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphisms related to AD risk influence Lp-PLA2 activity levels [7], yet the null activity polymorphism of the Lp-PLA2 gene was not associated with lower risk of AD in a large case-control study in Japan [8].

The principal aim of this study was to examine whether plasma Lp-PLA2 activity differed by diagnosis (AD, aMCI, cognitively healthy) in a clinically well characterised group of subjects. Such a finding could be used to support the rationale for the development of Lp-PLA2 modifying treatments for use in populations with, or at risk for, dementia. Additional objectives included: (i) exploring the associations between Lp-PLA2 and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of AD, (ii) assessing the association of Lp-PLA2 and markers of cardiovascular disease or diabetes in individuals with dementia, and (iii) investigating the relationship between Lp-PLA2 and APOE genotype.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Subjects with AD (by National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) [9] criteria, n = 78), amnestic MCI (aMCI) (by Petersen criteria, [10]n = 59), and cognitively healthy "normal controls" (n = 66) were recruited at the Memory Clinic, Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, and underwent detailed neuropsychological, clinical, biomarker and imaging assessments at baseline and 12 months post-baseline. All study participants were aged ≥ 50 and had between 7 and 20 years of education. Subjects with AD and aMCI were current clinic patients. Controls were identified from the participants of the Basel Study on the Elderly (BASEL Project) described elsewhere; recruitment was stratified to ensure an even distribution of controls across each decade of age (50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79 and 80 to 89) and across genders [11]. The study protocol was approved by the University of Basel Institutional Review board and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The current study is a cross-sectional analysis of data collected at the baseline study visit.

Laboratory procedures

Plasma aliquots, extracted from baseline blood samples and stored at -80°C, were transferred to Quest Diagnostics Inc. for Lp-PLA2 enzymatic activity measurement using an established colorimetric activity method (CAM) [12]. The upper limit of valid measurement for the CAM assay is 300 nmol/min/ml and subjects (n = 6) with values greater than or equal to 300 nmol/min/ml were assigned a value of 300 nmol/min/ml. Markers of AD in CSF -- total Tau (T-Tau), phosphorylated Tau, 181P-epitope (P-Tau), and amyloid beta protein 42 (Aß42) -- were collected at the baseline visit and measured by ELISA at the University of Basel using the manufacturer's recommended protocols (Innogenetics NV, Ghent, Belgium).

Statistical analysis

Differences in mean Lp-PLA2 activity between diagnosis groups (AD, aMCI and normal controls) were explored initially using ANOVA. The primary comparison of interest was between AD and normal controls. The study was powered to detect a difference of 20 nmol/min/ml with 90% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, assuming a mean (SD) of 144 (36) nmol/min/ml in the normal controls [13].

Potential confounders or modifiers of the relationship between AD and aMCI and Lp-PLA2 were explored in a multiple linear regression model using backwards elimination with a retention criterion of P < 0.1. Covariates included in the models were statin use (yes/no), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), European Cardiovascular Society (ESC) cardiovascular risk score [14] of > 5%, history of diabetes type 1 or 2, history of heart disease, Hachinksi ischaemia score [15], and white matter changes (Scheltens [16] and Wahlund scores [17]). Statin use, age and gender were forced to remain in the model given demonstrated associations between these factors and dementia or Lp-PLA2 activity [18-20].

Lp-PLA2 is largely bound to LDL in the circulation, possibly through apolipoprotein B (apoB) 100 [21], and whether or not to adjust analytically for apoB and/or LDL in studies of Lp-PLA2 and cardiovascular outcomes is a matter for current scientific debate [3,22]. While it is important to assess whether any observed associations of Lp-PLA2 with dementia may simply be proxies for an effect of LDL, controlling for LDL analytically could result in over-correction of the LpPLA2 values, obscuring a true association. To address this, the effect of LDL was explored by adjusting the final linear regression model arrived at through backwards elimination for LDL to assess whether this improved the model (assessed by comparison of model R2, BIC and AIC). Reporting models both with and without adjustment for LDL is an approach used in the cardiovascular field [3]. Ten subjects with data missing for at least one covariate were dropped from the backwards elimination modelling.

The secondary analyses of the correlates of Lp-PLA2 activity were exploratory, and were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to explore the association between Lp-PLA2 activity and (i) CSF markers of AD (Aß42, T-Tau and P-Tau), (ii) white matter changes (Scheltens score) and (iii) markers of cardiovascular disease and diabetes (LDL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol:HDL ratio, homocysteine and haemoglobin A1c (HgbA1C)). Student's t-tests were used to test for differences in mean Lp-PLA2 by APOE ε4 genotype (positive (1 or 2 ε4 alleles) versus negative (0 ε4 alleles)). Multiple linear regression was used to adjust the APOE ε4 comparison in the AD group for covariates (statin use, heart disease and LDL; explored in separate models).

All analyses were performed using SAS software, Version 9.1 for Windows. Copyright, SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Results

Subject demographics

The demographic characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. The groups differed in terms of age (P = 0.0005), gender (P = 0.02), education (P = 0.0005), homocysteine (P = 0.002), HDL (P = 0.005), Scheltens score [16] (P = 0.002), Wahlund score [17] (P = 0.04), Hachinski ischemia score [15] (P < 0.0001), CSF T-tau (P < 0.0001) and CSF P-tau (P < 0.0001); values were higher in the AD group than in the normal control group while values in the aMCI group were intermediate. Similarly, differences were detected across the groups for total cholesterol:HDL ratio (P = 0.01) and CSF Aβ42 (P < 0.0001); values for these measures were lower in the AD group than in the normal control group and, again, values in the aMCI group were intermediate. The mean score on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [23] in AD subjects was consistent with mild dementia

Table 1

Characteristics of subjects

Characteristic	AD(n = 78)	aMCI(n = 59)	Normal Control(n = 66)	P*
Demographic
Age, y (mean, SD)	75.7 (8.4)	71.3 (8.5)	71.1 (8.3)	0.0005
Female, N (%)	47 (60%)	28 (43%)	24 (36%)	0.017
Education, y (mean, SD)	11.4 (2.8)	12.8 (3.5)	13.1 (2.7)	0.0005
Clinical
Statin Use, N (%)	16 (21%)	17 (28.8%)	11 (17%)	0.26
BMI (mean, SD)	25.4 (3.2)	25.6 (3.9)	24.6 (3.7)	0.33
ESC score (mean, SD)	0.133 (0.110)	0.094 (0.102)	0.103 (0.078)	0.015
Diabetes type 1 or 2, N (%)	6 (7.7%)	1 (1.7%)	3 (4.5%)	0.30
History of heart disease, N (%)	8 (10.3%)	9 (15.3%)	7 (10.6%)	0.68
Hachinski score (mean, SD)	2.6 (1.9)	2.5 (2.6)	0.7 (1.0)	< 0.0001
Scheltens score (mean, SD)	12.2 (9.9)	10.8 (10.8)	6.4 (5.7)	0.0021
Wahlund score (mean, SD)	4.0 (2.7)	3.7 (2.8)	2.8 (1.7)	0.04
Duration of symptoms, y (mean, sd)	2.5 (2.4)	3.1 (3.3)	NA	0.63
MMSE, mean (mean, SD)	23.8 (2.7)	28 (1.7)	29.1 (1.0)	< 0.0001
Laboratory
LpPLA2, nmol/min/ml (mean, SD)	197.1 (38.4)	205.5 (43.4)	195.4 (41.9)	0.34
LDL, mmol/L (mean, SD)	2.9 (1.0)	2.9 (0.8)	3.0 (1.2)	0.79
HDL, mmol/L (mean, SD)	2.0 (0.5)	1.8 (0.5)	1.7 (0.5)	0.005
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio	3.0 (0.9)	3.2 (0.9)	3.5 (1.2)	0.012
Homocysteine, Umol/L (mean, sd)	15.1 (5.4)	14.1 (7.9)	12.3 (3.4)	0.002
HbA1c, % (SD)	5.6 (0.4)	5.6 (0.4)	5.5 (0.3)	0.43
CSF markers of AD
Aβ42, pg/ml (mean, SD)	421.4 (147.6)	568.2 (251.7)	809.7 (260.5)	< 0.0001
CSF T-Tau, pg/ml (mean, SD)	698.5 (317.2)	417.2 (245.6)	308.0 (195.9)	< 0.0001
CSF P-Tau, pg/ml (mean, SD)	101.9 (58.0)	62.9 (27.9)	52.0 (21.6)	< 0.0001
Genetic
APOE ε4-positive, N (%)	45 (58%)	30 (50.5%)	4 (6%)	NA†

*ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normal continuous variables, Fisher's exact test for ordinal variables. † Control selection was not independent of APOE status.

Plasma Lp-PLA2 activities

Mean plasma Lp-PLA2 activities were generally higher across all groups (195 to 206 nmol/min/ml) compared to those reported previously in the literature (144 to 146 nmol/min/ml) using the CAM assay [13,19] (Table 1 and Figure 1). There was no significant difference in Lp-PLA2 activity levels between the control group and the AD group (mean difference 1.7 nmol/min/ml, SD 6.8, P = 0.81) or aMCI group (mean difference 10.1 nmol/min/ml, SD 7.4, P = 0.17) in the unadjusted comparison.

Figure 1

Lp-PLA.

Results from the backwards elimination multiple linear regression model without LDL and for this model with adjustment for LDL are presented in Table 2. The model with adjustment for LDL had greater explanatory power than the model without LDL (F = 22.39, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.42 versus F = 3.6, P = 0.0012, R2 = 0.12, respectively; BIC and AIC both confirmed an improvement in fit). In both models female gender was associated with lower Lp-PLA2 activity. Statin use was also associated with lower Lp-PLA2 activity levels compared to non-use although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for LDL. In the model without LDL, increased BMI was a significant predictor of Lp-PLA2 activity; as with statin use, the effect of BMI was attenuated after adjustment for LDL. LDL was the strongest independent predictor of Lp-PLA2 activity in the model with LDL; a 1 mmol/L increase in LDL was associated with a 24.1 nmol/min/ml increase in Lp-PLA2 activity. Lp-PLA2 activity levels in aMCI trended higher relative to control subjects but the difference only reached statistical significance in the model which included LDL.

Table 2

Final linear regression models of Lp-PLA2 activity by diagnosis group

	Model Without LDL		Model With LDL
	β (SE)†	P	β (SE)†	P
AD (versus Control)*	7.7 (7.2)	0.29	8.3 (5.7)	0.15
aMCI (versus Control)*	11.3 (7.2)	0.12	11.6 (5.8)	0.05
Age (1 year increase)*	-0.19 (0.3)	0.58	0.39 (0.3)	0.16
Statin use (yes versus no)*	-23.9 (7.0)	0.001	-11.2 (5.8)	0.06
Gender (female versus male)*	-10.6 (6.2)	0.09	-23.8 (4.9)	< .0001
LDL (1 mmol/l increase)	NA	NA	24.1 (2.5)	< .0001
BMI	1.8 (0.8)	0.03	0.4 (0.69)	0.55
Diabetes Type 2 (yes versus no)	-23.3 (14.0)	0.10	-2.7 (11.6)	0.81

Final models selected through backwards elimination. Covariates with P-value < 0.05 are presented in bold. *Forced to remain in the model. † β estimates correspond to the expected difference in mean Lp-PLA2 activity relative to comparator for binary variables or per one unit increase in continuous covariates.

Plasma Lp-PLA2 activity did not correlate with CSF biomarkers nor with white matter changes within diagnoses, apart from a marginally significant inverse association with CSF Aβ42 in aMCI (r = -0.29, P = 0.03) (Table 3).

Table 3

Correlation between plasma Lp-PLA2 and (1) CSF biomarkers for AD and (2) Schelten Score for white matter changes

	-ß- amyloid(1-42)	P-Tau (181P epitope)	T-Tau	Schelten Score
	r (P)	r (P)	r (P)	r (P)
AD (n = 78)	-0.01 (0.91)	-0.20 (0.08)	-0.10 (0.40)	-0.03 (0.82)
aMCI (n = 59)	-0.29 (0.03)	-0.08 (0.54)	-0.14 (0.28)	0.20 (0.12)
Normal controls(n = 28 (CSF tests); n = 66 (Scheltens))	-0.17 (0.39)	0.35 (0.07)	0.27 (0.16)	-0.06 (0.63)

Correlations with P-value < 0.05 are presented in bold.

Correlations between plasma Lp-PLA2 and plasma markers of cardiovascular disease or diabetes were similar in magnitude and direction across diagnosis groups. Lp-PLA2 was correlated with LDL and total cholesterol:HDL ratio (r = 0.51 and 0.54, respectively, P < 0.001 in the total pooled sample) and inversely correlated with HDL (r = -0.32, P < 0.001). Lp-PLA2 was not associated with homocysteine or HgbA1c.

Lp-PLA2 levels tended to be higher in individuals who were APOE ε4 carriers in each diagnosis group (Table 4) In the AD diagnosis group, mean Lp-PLA2 activity was 26.2 nmol/min/l higher in individuals with APOE ε4 positive status compared to APOE ε4 negative individuals (P = 0.003). Adjustment for LDL levels removed this effect, however (P = 0.09). LDL levels also tended to be increased in APOE ε4 carriers and this difference was greatest in the AD group (P = 0.05).

Table 4

Lp-PLA2 activity and LDL by APOE ε4 status

		APOE E4+	APOE E4-
Normal control (n = 66)	Lp-PLA2, nmol/min/ml (mean, SD)	206.5 (27.0)	194.7 (42.8)
	LDL, mmol/L (mean, SD)	3.1 (1.3)	3.0 (1.1)
aMCI (n = 59)	Lp-PLA2, nmol/min/ml (mean, SD)	215.6 (42.1)	195.0 (42.9)
	LDL, mmol/L (mean, SD)	3.1 (0.8)	2.8 (0.8)
AD (n = 78)	Lp-PLA2, nmol/min/ml (mean, SD)	207.9 (41.2)*	181.6 (26.0)*
	LDL, mmol/L (mean, SD)	3.1 (1.2)*	2.6 (0.6)*

*P < 0.05 (t-test; values in bold).

Discussion

Findings from the Rotterdam Study suggested that Lp-PLA2, implicated in cardiovascular disease, could also be a risk factor for dementia [5] whereas analyses from the Framingham Study failed to replicate this association [6]. To our knowledge there have been no previously published studies of plasma Lp-PLA2 activity in established aMCI, a potential pre-stage of AD. In the current study, we detected no differences in Lp-PLA2 activity levels in cross-sectional comparisons among AD, aMCI and cognitively healthy subjects. Lp-PLA2 activity levels were moderately elevated in aMCI relative to control subjects after adjustment for LDL, but this requires further exploration in follow-up studies.

Lp-PLA2 activity was found to be associated with carriage of the APOE ε4 allele; however, this effect was removed after adjustment for LDL. An association between Lp-PLA2 activity and APOE genotype has been reported previously in a single gene study [24]. A recent genome-wide association study found that the G allele of the rs4420638 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in APOE was associated with increased Lp-PLA2 activity; the authors suggest that Lp-PLA2 activity would be expected to be increased in carriers of APOE ε4, given patterns of linkage disequilibrium between rs4420638 and the APOE ε2, ε3 and ε4 genotypes [25]. The correlations observed between Lp-PLA2 and LDL and between Lp-PLA2 and HDL across the diagnosis groups in our study reflect the findings of previous studies in the general population [19,26,27]. This suggests that mild AD and aMCI are not associated with an alteration in the relationships between these markers.

No strong correlations between Lp-PLA2 and CSF biomarkers for AD were observed in our study; the weak inverse association between Lp-PLA2 and CSF Aβ42 in the aMCI group (P = 0.041) may represent a false positive result from the multiple comparisons performed.

The current study identified the expected associations between AD diagnosis and levels of CSF Aβ42 and tau proteins relative to normal controls [28] and between Lp-PLA2 activity and blood lipids, gender and statin use [3]. These results increase confidence around the accuracy of the diagnostic classifications and biochemical measurements. However, the results of the study should be interpreted in the context of potential limitations of the biochemical measurements. First, the mean Lp-PLA2 activity observed in the control group (195.4 nmol/min/ml, SD 41.9) was higher than anticipated, based on levels observed in the Framingham Offspring study (144 nmol/min/ml, SD 36) [13] and the Dallas Heart Study (146 nmol/min/ml, SD 40) [19]. These differences may be related to cohort differences, such as the older mean age of the current study population, or assay factors. Secondly, the upper end of the valid range of assay sensitivity was determined by the assay manufacturers to be 300 nmol/min/ml. Six subjects (two with AD and four with aMCI) had Lp-PLA2 activity results that exceeded this value and were truncated accordingly. The effect of this truncation on the analyses cannot be quantified but it is likely that the effect would be to bias findings towards the null. Finally, this study evaluated Lp-PLA2 activity in plasma. The physiology of the blood-brain barrier and the biochemical complexity of plasma may limit plasma Lp-PLA2 activity/mass as a marker of central nervous system physiology [29]. A specific Lp-PLA2 activity has recently been reported to be present in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [30] and as this biofluid more closely reflects the composition of the brain extracellular space, may have a higher yield in biomarker evaluation [31].

Conclusions

The principal correlates of Lp-PLA2 activity in analyses of our small cross-sectional study were variables involved in lipid metabolism (LDL, HDL, total cholesterol:HDL ratio and statin use) and variables influencing lipid metabolism (APOEε4 and gender). Although there were suggested associations between aMCI and elevated Lp-PLA2 levels, and between CSF Aβ42 and Lp-PLA2 activity in the aMCI group, the results must be interpreted with caution until replicated in further studies given the small sample size and multiple comparisons associated with the current study.

Abbreviations

AD: Alzheimer's disease; aMCI: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment; APOE: apolipoprotein E; Aβ42: amyloid beta-42; BMI: Body mass index; CAM: Colorimetric activity method; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; HgbA1C: haemoglobin A1c; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein; Lp-PLA2: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2; MMSE: Mini Mental Status Examination; NINCDS-ADRDA: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association; PAF-AH: Platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase; P-Tau: Phosphorylated tau; SD: Standard deviation; SNP: Single-nucleotide polymorphism; T-Tau: Total tau.

Competing interests

JED, LA, AL, HAS-F, VM and MCI were employees of GlaxoSmithKline at the time of writing. JED, AL, HAS-F, VM and MCI were also stockholders of GlaxoSmithKline plc.

Authors' contributions

JED designed the current study analysis, performed the data analyses and drafted the manuscript. AL, LA, HS-F, VM and MCI contributed to the study design, interpretation of results and manuscript drafting. MS, AR and AUM collected data, and contributed to interpretation of results and manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.