Literature DB >> 23217237

Meta-analysis of the effect of immunocastration on production performance, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds in pigs.

N Batorek1, M Čandek-Potokar, M Bonneau, J Van Milgen.   

Abstract

Meta-analytical approach was used to quantitatively synthesize the effect of immunocastration on growth, carcass, meat quality, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds. Altogether, 41 papers were collected for effect size (θ) calculation and the comparisons were made with entire males (EM) and surgical castrates (SC). The data for reproductive organs and growth performance are numerous enough to draw firm conclusions. In contrast, data for carcass and meat quality are more limited. Results of meta-analysis show efficient immunocastration with the magnitude of the response being by far the largest for reproductive organs (θ = -2.8 to -5.0) and boar taint substances (θ = -2.8 and -0.8 for androstenone and skatole, respectively). However, compared with SC, the immunocastrates exhibit larger bulbourethral glands (θ = 1.3) and slightly higher concentrations of androstenone and skatole (θ = 0.1 and θ = 0.2, respectively). The impact of immunocastration is also remarkable on performance, where the main advantage of the immunocastrates is their boar-like performance until revaccination. In the period following the second vaccination, they eat much more than EM (θ = 2.1), resulting in large effect size for growth rate compared with both EM and SC (θ = 1.1 and θ = 1.4, respectively). Considering the whole fattening period, their feed conversion ratio is higher compared with EM (θ = 0.6) and much lower than that of SC (θ = -1.3), although exhibiting moderately faster growth compared with both (θ = 0.6 and θ = 0.2, respectively). With regard to carcass quality, the immunocastrates take intermediate position between EM and SC. Besides, our analysis suggests no difference in meat quality with SC and some meat quality advantages of immunocastrates over EM because of higher intramuscular fat content (θ = 0.4) and lower shear force (θ = -0.6).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23217237     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112000146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  18 in total

1.  Leydig Cells in Immunocastrated Polish Landrace Pig Testis: Differentiation Status and Steroid Enzyme Expression Status.

Authors:  Piotr Pawlicki; Anna Galuszka; Laura Pardyak; Ryszard Tuz; Bartosz J Płachno; Martyna Malopolska; Klaudia Dubniewicz; Ping Yang; Malgorzata Kotula-Balak; Kazimierz Tarasiuk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Lysine requirement for growing-finishing immunocastrated male pigs.

Authors:  Leandro Alebrante; Juarez Lopes Donzele; Rita Flavia Miranda de Oliveira Donzele; Francisco Carlos de Oliveira da Silva; Charles Kiefer; Gabriel Cipriano Rocha
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  The Effect of Lupinus albus and Calcium Chloride on Growth Performance, Body Composition, Plasma Biochemistry and Meat Quality of Male Pigs Immunized Against Gonadotrophin Releasing Factor.

Authors:  Karen Moore; Bruce Mullan; Jae Cheol Kim; Frank Dunshea
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Meat Quality Derived from High Inclusion of a Micro-Alga or Insect Meal as an Alternative Protein Source in Poultry Diets: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Brianne A Altmann; Carmen Neumann; Susanne Velten; Frank Liebert; Daniel Mörlein
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-03-08

5.  Quality of Dry-Cured Ham from Entire, Surgically and Immunocastrated Males: Case Study on Kraški Pršut.

Authors:  Marjeta Čandek-Potokar; Martin Škrlep; Eliza Kostyra; Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans; Klavdija Poklukar; Nina Batorek-Lukač; Kevin Kress; Ulrike Weiler; Volker Stefanski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Influence of Housing Conditions on Reliability of Immunocastration and Consequences for Growth Performance of Male Pigs.

Authors:  Kevin Kress; Ulrike Weiler; Sonja Schmucker; Marjeta Čandek-Potokar; Milka Vrecl; Gregor Fazarinc; Martin Škrlep; Nina Batorek-Lukač; Volker Stefanski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Pork Production with Entire Males: Directions for Control of Boar Taint.

Authors:  E James Squires; Christine Bone; Jocelyn Cameron
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Influences of Immunocastration on Endocrine Parameters, Growth Performance and Carcass Quality, as Well as on Boar Taint and Penile Injuries.

Authors:  Susanne Zoels; Simon Reiter; Mathias Ritzmann; Christine Weiß; Jasmin Numberger; Aneka Schütz; Peter Lindner; Volker Stefanski; Ulrike Weiler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Pros and Cons of Alternatives to Piglet Castration: Welfare, Boar Taint, and Other Meat Quality Traits.

Authors:  Michel Bonneau; Ulrike Weiler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  On the Road to End Pig Pain: Knowledge and Attitudes of Brazilian Citizens Regarding Castration.

Authors:  Maria José Hötzel; Maria Cristina Yunes; Bianca Vandresen; Rita Albernaz-Gonçalves; Raphaela E Woodroffe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.