Literature DB >> 23216470

A regulatory perspective of clinical trial applications for biological products with particular emphasis on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs).

David R Jones1, James W McBlane, Graham McNaughton, Nishanthan Rajakumaraswamy, Kirsty Wydenbach.   

Abstract

The safety of trial subjects is the tenet that guides the regulatory assessment of a Clinical Trial Authorization application and applies equally to trials involving small molecules and those with biological/biotechnological products, including Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. The objective of a regulator is to ensure that the potential risk faced by a trial subject is outweighed by the potential benefit to them from taking part in the trial. The focus of the application review is to assess whether risks have been identified and appropriate steps taken to alleviate these as much as possible. Other factors are also taken into account during a review, such as regulatory requirements, and emerging non-clinical and clinical data from other trials on the same or similar products. This paper examines the regulatory review process of a Clinical Trial Authorization application from the perspectives of Quality, Non-Clinical and Clinical Regulatory Assessors at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. It should be noted that each perspective has highlighted specific issues from their individual competence and that these can be different between the disciplines.
© 2012 Crown copyright. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society. This article A regulatory perspective of clinical trial applications for biological products with particular emphasis on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) was written by David R. Jones, James W. McBlane, Graham McNaughton, Nishanthan Rajakumaraswamy & Kirsty Wydenbach of Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). It is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.

Keywords:  biotechnology; clinical; clinical trials; non-clinical; quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23216470      PMCID: PMC3731595          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  10 in total

1.  Debate over details of US biosimilar pathway continues to rage.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Fox
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Etika Bioet       Date:  2002 Spring-Summer

3.  Understanding and applying regulatory guidance on the nonclinical development of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  David J Snodin; Peter R Ryle
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 4.  Nonclinical safety strategies for stem cell therapies.

Authors:  Michaela E Sharpe; Daniel Morton; Annamaria Rossi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 5.  Carcinogenicity assessments of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals: a review of approved molecules and best practice recommendations.

Authors:  John L Vahle; Gregory L Finch; Shawn M Heidel; David N Hovland; Inge Ivens; Suezanne Parker; Rafael A Ponce; Clifford Sachs; Ronald Steigerwalt; Brian Short; Marque D Todd
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 6.  Safety evaluation to support First-In-Man investigations I: kinetic and safety pharmacology studies.

Authors:  Paul Baldrick
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Commentary on the EMA Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products.

Authors:  Joop van Gerven; Milton Bonelli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  An analysis of pharmaceutical experience with decades of rat carcinogenicity testing: support for a proposal to modify current regulatory guidelines.

Authors:  Frank D Sistare; Daniel Morton; Carl Alden; Joel Christensen; Douglas Keller; Sandra De Jonghe; Richard D Storer; M Vijayaraj Reddy; Andrew Kraynak; Bruce Trela; Jean-Guy Bienvenu; Sivert Bjurström; Vanessa Bosmans; David Brewster; Karyn Colman; Mark Dominick; John Evans; James R Hailey; Lewis Kinter; Matt Liu; Charles Mahrt; Dirk Marien; James Myer; Richard Perry; Daniel Potenta; Arthur Roth; Philip Sherratt; Thomas Singer; Rabih Slim; Keith Soper; Ronny Fransson-Steen; James Stoltz; Oliver Turner; Susan Turnquist; Marjolein van Heerden; Jochen Woicke; Joseph J DeGeorge
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 9.  Assessing the safety of stem cell therapeutics.

Authors:  Chris E P Goldring; Paul A Duffy; Nissim Benvenisty; Peter W Andrews; Uri Ben-David; Rowena Eakins; Neil French; Neil A Hanley; Lorna Kelly; Neil R Kitteringham; Jens Kurth; Deborah Ladenheim; Hugh Laverty; James McBlane; Gopalan Narayanan; Sara Patel; Jens Reinhardt; Annamaria Rossi; Michaela Sharpe; B Kevin Park
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 10.  Considerations in assessing the developmental and reproductive toxicity potential of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Pauline L Martin; William Breslin; Meredith Rocca; David Wright; Joy Cavagnaro
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2009-06
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Biological therapies: a long way on from Jenner.

Authors:  Albert Ferro; Malcolm Boyce
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.335

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.