Literature DB >> 23215900

Long-term mortality following peptic ulcer perforation in the PULP trial. A nationwide follow-up study.

Morten Hylander Møller1, Morten Vester-Andersen, Reimar Wernich Thomsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Morbidity and mortality following perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remain substantial. In the recently published PULP trial, 30-day mortality in patients surgically treated for PPU decreased from 27% to 17% following the implementation of a perioperative care protocol based on The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. The objective of the present study was to evaluate long-term mortality in the PULP trial intervention and control cohort.
DESIGN: nationwide follow-up study of a multicenter, non-randomized, clinical trial with external controls.
SETTING: Danish patients surgically treated for PPU between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009. PATIENTS: 117 patients in the intervention group and 512 in the control group. INTERVENTION: a perioperative care protocol based on The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. OUTCOME MEASURES: 60-day, 90-day, 180-day, 1-year, and 2-year mortality rates. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: survival statistics.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, clinical, and perioperative data were in general, similar in the intervention and control group. Sixty days postoperatively, the originally observed difference in 30-day mortality had diminished (25% vs. 30%, p = 0.268). After 180 days, the mortality difference was reduced additionally (31% vs. 33%, p = 0.645), and one year postoperatively, a mortality difference was no longer present (36% in both groups, p = 0.993). Two years postoperatively, the mortality rate in the intervention group was 44%, as compared to 40% in the control group (p = 0.472).
CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit associated with a perioperative care protocol in patients treated for PPU decreases progressively after 30 days and is no longer present after one year. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00624169 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23215900     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.746393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  6 in total

1.  Long-Term Mortality in Patients Operated for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Factors Limiting Longevity are Dominated by Older Age, Comorbidity Burden and Severe Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  K Thorsen; J A Søreide; K Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Elena Pallari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 3.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effects of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in the Treatment of Endodontic Diseases.

Authors:  Jian Sun; Yuanyuan Wei; Xiaobei Tian; Qinglin Men
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Risk factors for gastric perforation after cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: Splenectomy and increased body mass index.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Mathilde Del; Federico Migliorelli; Manon Daix; Anaïs Provendier; Muriel Picard; Jean Ruiz; Elodie Chantalat; Hélène Leray; Alejandra Martinez; Laurence Gladieff; Gwénaël Ferron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Epidemiology of perforating peptic ulcer: A population-based retrospective study over 40 years.

Authors:  Aydin Dadfar; Tom-Harald Edna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.