Literature DB >> 23215032

Peptide backbone sampling convergence with the adaptive biasing force algorithm.

Christina E Faller1, Kyle A Reilly, Ronald D Hills, Olgun Guvench.   

Abstract

Complete Boltzmann sampling of reaction coordinates in biomolecular systems continues to be a challenge for unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. A growing number of methods have been developed for applying biases to biomolecular systems to enhance sampling while enabling recovery of the unbiased (Boltzmann) distribution of states. The adaptive biasing force (ABF) algorithm is one such method and works by canceling out the average force along the desired reaction coordinate(s) using an estimate of this force progressively accumulated during the simulation. Upon completion of the simulation, the potential of mean force, and therefore Boltzmann distribution of states, is obtained by integrating this average force. In an effort to characterize the expected performance in applications such as protein loop sampling, ABF was applied to the full ranges of the Ramachandran φ/ψ backbone dihedral reaction coordinates for dipeptides of the 20 amino acids using all-atom explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations. Approximately half of the dipeptides exhibited robust and rapid convergence of the potential of mean force as a function of φ/ψ in triplicate 50 ns simulations, while the remainder exhibited varying degrees of less complete convergence. The greatest difficulties in achieving converged ABF sampling were seen in the branched-side chain amino acids threonine and valine, as well as the special case of proline. Proline dipeptide sampling was further complicated by trans-to-cis peptide bond isomerization not observed in unbiased control molecular dynamics simulations. Overall, the ABF method was found to be a robust means of sampling the entire φ/ψ reaction coordinate for the 20 amino acids, including high free-energy regions typically inaccessible in standard molecular dynamics simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23215032      PMCID: PMC3951443          DOI: 10.1021/jp309741j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  21 in total

1.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields.

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods.

Authors:  David Rodriguez-Gomez; Eric Darve; Andrew Pohorille
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Overcoming free energy barriers using unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jérôme Hénin; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Mechanism of binding site conformational switching in the CD44-hyaluronan protein-carbohydrate binding interaction.

Authors:  Francis W Jamison; Theresa J Foster; Jacob A Barker; Ronald D Hills; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Exploring the free-energy landscape of a short peptide using an average force.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot; Jérôme Hénin
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 8.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

9.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions.

Authors:  J Schlitter; M Engels; P Krüger
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1994-06

10.  Tyr66 acts as a conformational switch in the closed-to-open transition of the SHP-2 N-SH2-domain phosphotyrosine-peptide binding cleft.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Cheng-Kui Qu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-03-22
View more
  8 in total

1.  CD44 receptor unfolding enhances binding by freeing basic amino acids to contact carbohydrate ligand.

Authors:  Amanda J Favreau; Christina E Faller; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Collective variable approaches for single molecule flexible fitting and enhanced sampling.

Authors:  Harish Vashisth; Georgios Skiniotis; Charles Lee Brooks
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Initiation of prolyl cis-trans isomerisation in the CDR-H3 loop of an antibody in response to antigen binding.

Authors:  Keiko Shinoda; Hideaki Fujitani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis.

Authors:  Yuzhen Niu; Danfeng Shi; Lanlan Li; Jingyun Guo; Huanxiang Liu; Xiaojun Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Structure and Dynamics of a Site-Specific Labeled Fc Fragment with Altered Effector Functions.

Authors:  D Travis Gallagher; Chris McCullough; Robert G Brinson; Joomi Ahn; John P Marino; Nazzareno Dimasi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Influence of Chirality of Crizotinib on Its MTH1 Protein Inhibitory Activity: Insight from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Yuzhen Niu; Dabo Pan; Danfeng Shi; Qifeng Bai; Huanxiang Liu; Xiaojun Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Molecular dynamics of the proline switch and its role in Crk signaling.

Authors:  Junchao Xia; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Native proteins trap high-energy transit conformations.

Authors:  Andrew E Brereton; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.