Literature DB >> 23214919

Morphological comparison of PVA scaffolds obtained by gas foaming and microfluidic foaming techniques.

Cristina Colosi1, Marco Costantini, Andrea Barbetta, Raffaella Pecci, Rossella Bedini, Mariella Dentini.   

Abstract

In this article, we have exploited a microfluidic foaming technique for the generation of highly monodisperse gas-in-liquid bubbles as a templating system for scaffolds characterized by an ordered and homogeneous porous texture. An aqueous poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) solution (containing a surfactant) and a gas (argon) are injected simultaneously at constant flow rates in a flow-focusing device (FFD), in which the gas thread breaks up to form monodisperse bubbles. Immediately after its formation, the foam is collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried, and cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. In order to highlight the superior morphological quality of the obtained porous material, a comparison between this scaffold and another one, also constituted of PVA but obtained with a traditional gas foaming technique, was carried out. Such a comparison has been conducted by analyzing electron microscopy and X-ray microtomographic images of the two samples. It turned out that the microfluidic produced scaffold was characterized by much more uniform porous texture than the gas-foaming one as witnessed by narrower pore size, interconnection, and wall thickness distributions. On the other side, scarce pore interconnectivity, relatively low pore volume, and limited production rate represent, by now, the principal disadvantages of microfluidic foaming as scaffold fabrication method, emphasizing the kind of improvement that this technique needs to undergo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23214919     DOI: 10.1021/la303788z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  4 in total

1.  (Bio)manufactured Solutions for Treatment of Bone Defects with Emphasis on US-FDA Regulatory Science Perspective.

Authors:  Pejman Ghelich; Mehdi Kazemzadeh-Narbat; Alireza Hassani Najafabadi; Mohamadmahdi Samandari; Adnan Memic; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2022-01-05

2.  Development of 3D PVA scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering and cell screening applications.

Authors:  Elisabetta Dattola; Elvira Immacolata Parrotta; Stefania Scalise; Gerardo Perozziello; Tania Limongi; Patrizio Candeloro; Maria Laura Coluccio; Carmine Maletta; Luigi Bruno; Maria Teresa De Angelis; Gianluca Santamaria; Vincenzo Mollace; Ernesto Lamanna; Enzo Di Fabrizio; Giovanni Cuda
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Stabilizing decontamination foam using surface-modified silica nanoparticles containing chemical reagent: foam stability, structures, and dispersion properties.

Authors:  In-Ho Yoon; Suk Bon Yoon; Youngho Sihn; Man-Soo Choi; Chong-Hun Jung; Wang-Kyu Choi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Microfluidics Mediated Production of Foams for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Ilham Maimouni; Cesare M Cejas; Janine Cossy; Patrick Tabeling; Maria Russo
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 2.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.