| Literature DB >> 23213629 |
Musso Munyeme1, Hetron Mweemba Munang'andu, Andrew Nambota, John Bwalya Muma, Andrew Malata Phiri, King Shimumbo Nalubamba.
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) and fasciolosis are important but neglected diseases that result in chronic infections in cattle. However, in Zambia, these diseases are mainly diagnosed at abattoirs during routine meat inspection. Albeit the coinfection status, these diseases have been reported as nothing more than normal separate findings without an explanatory phenomena. Forthwith, we formulated this study to assess the possible association of the two diseases in a known high prevalence area on the Kafue basin ecosystem. Of the 1,680 animals screened, 600 (35.7%; 95% CI 33.4%-38%) and 124 (7.4%; 95% CI 6.1%-8.6%) had fasciolosis and tuberculous lesions; respectively, whilst 72 had both fasciola and tuberculous lesions representing 12% (95% CI 9.4%-14.6%) and 58.1% (95% CI; 49.3%-66.7%) of the total positives for fasciola and tuberculosis, respectively. Jaundice was seen in 304 animals, 18.1% (95% CI; 16.3%-19.9%) and was significantly correlated to fasciolosis (r = 0.59, P < 0.0001). A significant association (χ(2) = 76.2, df = 1, and P < 0.0001) was found between fasciolosis and tuberculous lesions. Simple logistic regression intimated fasciolosis as a strong predictor for tuberculous lesions with animals that had fasciola being five times more likely to have tuberculous lesions (odds ratio = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.3-7.0). This study indicates that transmission and spatial risk factors of communicable and noncommunicable diseases such as bTB and fasciolosis can be correlated in an ecosystem such as the Kafue flats.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23213629 PMCID: PMC3504483 DOI: 10.1155/2012/921869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Figure 1Map showing study area.
Figure 2The graph indicates correlation of tuberculosis and fasciola condemned organs to area of origin. Note that at slaughter, animals with high fluke condemnation rate corresponded to those for tuberculosis by area of origin.
Proportion estimates and linear correlation of tuberculosis and fasciolosis positives based on abattoir survey by area of origin (n = 1,680, February to June of 2008) in Zambia.
| Origin of | No. supplied | Abattoir Positives | 95% CI | Condemned livers¥ | 95% CI | Correlation TB and |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| animals | TB (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | fasciola by area ( | |
| Namwala€ | 294 | 21 (7.14) | (4.2, 10.1) | 107 (36.39) | (30.9, 41.9) | 0.26 |
| Maala | 499 | 44 (8.82) | (6.3, 11.3) | 164 (32.87) | (28.7, 36.9) | 0.20 |
| Basanga* | 193 | 14 (7.25) | (3.5, 10.9) | 73 (37.82) | (30.1, 44.7) | 0.15 |
| Lubwe* | 308 | 11 (3.57) | (1.4, 5.6) | 114 (37.01) | (31.6, 42.4) | 0.14 |
| Bambwe | 50 | 4 (8.0) | (0.4, 15.6) | 20 (40.00) | (26.2, 53.7) | 0.30 |
| Katantila* | 7 | 0 (0.0) | 3 (42.86) | (3.2, 82.4) | ||
| Namusonde | 31 | 3 (9.68) | (0.0, 20.3) | 14 (45.16) | (27.0, 62.9) | 0.15 |
| K/mwanda | 13 | 2 (15.38) | (0.0, 35.8) | 3 (23.08) | (0.0, 46.9) | −0.12 |
| Banamwaze* | 56 | 5 (8.93) | (1.3, 16.5) | 16 (28.57) | (16.6, 40.5) | 0.12 |
| Kantengwa* | 65 | 5 (7.69) | (1.2, 14.2) | 32 (49.23) | (36.9, 61.4) | 0.50 |
| Chitongo* | 84 | 5 (5.95) | (0.1, 11.0) | 31 (36.90) | (26.5, 47.2) | 0.31 |
| Muchila* | 42 | 6 (14.29) | (3.5, 25.0) | 9 (21.43) | (8.9, 33.9) | 0.55 |
| Itezhi-tezhi* | 38 | 4 (10.53) | (0.1, 20.4) | 14 (36.84) | (21.0, 52.3) | 0.01 |
|
| ||||||
| Overall | 1,680 | 24 (7.38) | (6.1, 8.6) | 600 (35.7) | (33.4, 38.0) | 0.13 |
Some cattle owners were identified by their villages, and these were then allocated to the nearest block area operated by a veterinary camp for ease of stratifying the data by area (refer to Figure 1). ¥Only whole liver condemnations were considered as condemnations, not partial trimmings, and only jaundice was included and no other lesions that may explain presence of chronic fasciolosis. €For Namwala Central, some were actual owners of the animals whilst a greater majority were cattle traders, despite animals being bought somewhere else, which were recorded under Namwala Central due to lack of recall of places of origin.