Literature DB >> 23213179

Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences.

A M Musters1, Y E M Koot, N M van den Boogaard, E Kaaijk, N S Macklon, F van der Veen, P T Nieuwkerk, M Goddijn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supportive care is regularly offered to women with recurrent miscarriages (RMs). Their preferences for supportive care in their next pregnancy have been identified by qualitative research. The aim of this study was to quantify these supportive care preferences and identify women's characteristics that are associated with a higher or lower need for supportive care in women with RM.
METHODS: A questionnaire study was conducted in women with RMs (≥ 2 miscarriages) in three hospitals in the Netherlands. All women who received diagnostic work-up for RMs from January 2010 to December 2010 were sent a questionnaire. The questionnaire quantified supportive care options identified by a previous qualitative study. We next analysed associations between women's characteristics (age, ethnicity, education level, parity, pregnancy during questionnaire and time passed since last miscarriage) and their feelings about supportive care options to elucidate any differences between groups.
RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six women were asked to participate in the study. In total, 174 women responded (response rate 65%) and 171 questionnaires were analysed. Women with RM preferred the following supportive care options for their next pregnancy: a plan with one doctor who shows understanding, takes them seriously, has knowledge of their obstetric history, listens to them, gives information about RM, shows empathy, informs on progress and enquires about emotional needs. Also, an ultrasound examination during symptoms, directly after a positive pregnancy test and every 2 weeks. Finally, if a miscarriage occurred, most women would prefer to talk to a medical or psychological professional afterwards. The majority of women expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and for bereavement therapy. The median preference, on a scale from 1 to 10, for supportive care was 8.0. Ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with RM preferred a plan for the first trimester that involved one doctor, ultrasounds and the exercise of soft skills, like showing understanding, listening skills, awareness of obstetrical history and respect towards the patient and their miscarriage, by the health care professionals. In the event of a miscarriage, women prefer aftercare. Women from ethnic minorities and women who were not pregnant during the questionnaire investigation were the two patient groups who preferred the most supportive care options. Tailor-made supportive care can now be offered to women with RM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23213179     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Recurrent Miscarriage: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Guideline of the DGGG (S1-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/050, December 2013).

Authors:  B Toth; W Würfel; M K Bohlmann; G Gillessen-Kaesbach; F Nawroth; N Rogenhofer; C Tempfer; T Wischmann; M von Wolff
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Cloud Based Surveys to Assess Patient Perceptions of Health Care: 1000 Respondents in 3 days for US $300.

Authors:  Jonah Bardos; Jenna Friedenthal; Jessica Spiegelman; Zev Williams
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-08-23

3.  Does acupuncture have a role in the treatment of threatened miscarriage? Findings from a feasibility randomised trial and semi-structured participant interviews.

Authors:  Debra Betts; Caroline A Smith; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Time to next pregnancy in spontaneous pregnancies versus treatment cycles in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Candice O Perfetto; Gayathree Murugappan; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-04-21

5.  ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Ruth Bender Atik; Ole Bjarne Christiansen; Janine Elson; Astrid Marie Kolte; Sheena Lewis; Saskia Middeldorp; Willianne Nelen; Braulio Peramo; Siobhan Quenby; Nathalie Vermeulen; Mariëtte Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-04-06

6.  Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Bailey; Jacky Boivin; Ying C Cheong; Ellen Kitson-Reynolds; Christopher Bailey; Nick Macklon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Predicting first-trimester outcome of embryos with cardiac activity in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Huixian Li; Shuang Qin; Fanfan Xiao; Yuhong Li; Yunhe Gao; Jiexin Zhang; Qing Xiao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.

Authors:  N A du Fossé; E E L O Lashley; T T Treurniet; J M M van Lith; S le Cessie; H Boosman; M L P van der Hoorn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Psychological and support interventions to reduce levels of stress, anxiety or depression on women's subsequent pregnancy with a history of miscarriage: an empty systematic review.

Authors:  Indra San Lazaro Campillo; Sarah Meaney; Karen McNamara; Keelin O'Donoghue
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Psychological distress in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A case-control study.

Authors:  Hajar Adib-Rad; Zahra Basirat; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Amrollah Mostafazadeh; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.