BACKGROUND: Adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation (AMRR) is a novel integration of motion capture technology and high-level media computing that provides precise kinematic measurements and engaging multimodal feedback for self-assessment during a therapeutic task. OBJECTIVE: We describe the first proof-of-concept study to compare outcomes of AMRR and traditional upper-extremity physical therapy. METHODS: Two groups of participants with chronic stroke received either a month of AMRR therapy (n = 11) or matched dosing of traditional repetitive task therapy (n = 10). Participants were right handed, between 35 and 85 years old, and could independently reach to and at least partially grasp an object in front of them. Upper-extremity clinical scale scores and kinematic performances were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: Both groups showed increased function after therapy, demonstrated by statistically significant improvements in Wolf Motor Function Test and upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores, with the traditional therapy group improving significantly more on the FMA. However, only participants who received AMRR therapy showed a consistent improvement in kinematic measurements, both for the trained task of reaching to grasp a cone and the untrained task of reaching to push a lighted button. CONCLUSIONS: AMRR may be useful in improving both functionality and the kinematics of reaching. Further study is needed to determine if AMRR therapy induces long-term changes in movement quality that foster better functional recovery.
BACKGROUND: Adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation (AMRR) is a novel integration of motion capture technology and high-level media computing that provides precise kinematic measurements and engaging multimodal feedback for self-assessment during a therapeutic task. OBJECTIVE: We describe the first proof-of-concept study to compare outcomes of AMRR and traditional upper-extremity physical therapy. METHODS: Two groups of participants with chronic stroke received either a month of AMRR therapy (n = 11) or matched dosing of traditional repetitive task therapy (n = 10). Participants were right handed, between 35 and 85 years old, and could independently reach to and at least partially grasp an object in front of them. Upper-extremity clinical scale scores and kinematic performances were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: Both groups showed increased function after therapy, demonstrated by statistically significant improvements in Wolf Motor Function Test and upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores, with the traditional therapy group improving significantly more on the FMA. However, only participants who received AMRR therapy showed a consistent improvement in kinematic measurements, both for the trained task of reaching to grasp a cone and the untrained task of reaching to push a lighted button. CONCLUSIONS: AMRR may be useful in improving both functionality and the kinematics of reaching. Further study is needed to determine if AMRR therapy induces long-term changes in movement quality that foster better functional recovery.
Authors: Susan V Duff; Jiaxiu He; Monica A Nelsen; Christianne J Lane; Veronica T Rowe; Steve L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Carolee J Winstein Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Lin Lu; Honglin Wang; Pengran Liu; Rong Liu; Jiayao Zhang; Yi Xie; Songxiang Liu; Tongtong Huo; Mao Xie; Xinghuo Wu; Zhewei Ye Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-02-22