PURPOSE: To investigate factors that influence the multiplet pattern observed in J-difference editing of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). METHODS: Density matrix simulations were applied to investigate the shape of the 3 ppm GABA multiplet as a function of the editing sequence's slice-selective refocusing pulse properties, in particular bandwidth, transition width, and flip angle. For comparison to the calculations, experimental measurements were also made at 3 T on a 10 mM GABA solution using the MEGA-PRESS sequence at various refocusing pulse flip angles. RESULTS: Good agreement was found between experiments and simulations. The edited multiplet consists of two outer lines of slightly unequal intensity due to strong coupling, and a smaller central line, the result of the unequal J-couplings between the C4 and C3 protons. The size of the center peak increases with increasing slice-selective refocusing pulse transition width, and deviation of the flip angle from 180°. CONCLUSION: The 3 ppm GABA multiplet pattern observed in the MEGA-PRESS experiment depends quite strongly on the properties of the slice-selective refocusing pulses used. Under some circumstance, the central peak can be quite large; this does not necessarily indicate inefficient editing, or a subtraction artifact, but should be recognized as a property of the pulse sequence itself.
PURPOSE: To investigate factors that influence the multiplet pattern observed in J-difference editing of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). METHODS: Density matrix simulations were applied to investigate the shape of the 3 ppm GABA multiplet as a function of the editing sequence's slice-selective refocusing pulse properties, in particular bandwidth, transition width, and flip angle. For comparison to the calculations, experimental measurements were also made at 3 T on a 10 mM GABA solution using the MEGA-PRESS sequence at various refocusing pulse flip angles. RESULTS: Good agreement was found between experiments and simulations. The edited multiplet consists of two outer lines of slightly unequal intensity due to strong coupling, and a smaller central line, the result of the unequal J-couplings between the C4 and C3 protons. The size of the center peak increases with increasing slice-selective refocusing pulse transition width, and deviation of the flip angle from 180°. CONCLUSION: The 3 ppm GABA multiplet pattern observed in the MEGA-PRESS experiment depends quite strongly on the properties of the slice-selective refocusing pulses used. Under some circumstance, the central peak can be quite large; this does not necessarily indicate inefficient editing, or a subtraction artifact, but should be recognized as a property of the pulse sequence itself.
Authors: Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Richard A E Edden; Derek K Jones; Jennifer B Swettenham; Krish D Singh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mark Mikkelsen; Peter B Barker; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Maiken K Brix; Pieter F Buur; Kim M Cecil; Kimberly L Chan; David Y-T Chen; Alexander R Craven; Koen Cuypers; Michael Dacko; Niall W Duncan; Ulrike Dydak; David A Edmondson; Gabriele Ende; Lars Ersland; Fei Gao; Ian Greenhouse; Ashley D Harris; Naying He; Stefanie Heba; Nigel Hoggard; Tun-Wei Hsu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Alayar Kangarlu; Thomas Lange; R Marc Lebel; Yan Li; Chien-Yuan E Lin; Jy-Kang Liou; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Feng Liu; Ruoyun Ma; Celine Maes; Marta Moreno-Ortega; Scott O Murray; Sean Noah; Ralph Noeske; Michael D Noseworthy; Georg Oeltzschner; James J Prisciandaro; Nicolaas A J Puts; Timothy P L Roberts; Markus Sack; Napapon Sailasuta; Muhammad G Saleh; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Nicholas Simard; Stephan P Swinnen; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Truong; Guangbin Wang; Iain D Wilkinson; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Hongmin Xu; Fuhua Yan; Chencheng Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Helge J Zöllner; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kimberly L Chan; Nicolaas A J Puts; Karim Snoussi; Ashley D Harris; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ashley D Harris; Benjamin Glaubitz; Jamie Near; C John Evans; Nicolaas A J Puts; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Muhammad G Saleh; Mark Mikkelsen; Georg Oeltzschner; Kimberly L Chan; Adam Berrington; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ashley D Harris; Nicolaas A J Puts; S Andrea Wijtenburg; Laura M Rowland; Mark Mikkelsen; Peter B Barker; C John Evans; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Richard A E Edden; Georg Oeltzschner; Ashley D Harris; Nicolaas A J Puts; Kimberly L Chan; Vincent O Boer; Michael Schär; Peter B Barker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kimberly L Chan; Georg Oeltzschner; Muhammad G Saleh; Richard A E Edden; Peter B Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kimberly L Chan; Muhammad G Saleh; Georg Oeltzschner; Peter B Barker; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 6.556