Literature DB >> 23212935

Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin: old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents.

Michelle L Campbell1, Dror Marchaim, Jason M Pogue, Bharath Sunkara, Suchitha Bheemreddy, Pradeep Bathina, Harish Pulluru, Neelu Chugh, Melanie N Wilson, Judy Moshos, Kimberley Ku, Kayoko Hayakawa, Emily T Martin, Paul R Lephart, Michael J Rybak, Keith S Kaye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 μg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 μg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records.
RESULTS: There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23212935     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1R211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  13 in total

Review 1.  Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Fernando Antonanzas; Carmen Lozano; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of Vancomycin Use in Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis Using the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve to the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration ≥400 Target.

Authors:  Jiraganya Bhongsatiern; Chris Stockmann; Jessica K Roberts; Tian Yu; Kent E Korgenski; Michael G Spigarelli; Pankaj B Desai; Catherine M T Sherwin
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus vancomycin for severe infections caused by meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Jihad Bishara; Dafna Yahav; Elad Goldberg; Ami Neuberger; Nesrin Ghanem-Zoubi; Yaakov Dickstein; William Nseir; Michael Dan; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-05-14

Review 5.  A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics.

Authors:  Nadim Cassir; Jean-Marc Rolain; Philippe Brouqui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Cost-effectiveness and pricing of antibacterial drugs.

Authors:  Talitha I Verhoef; Stephen Morris
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.817

7.  Longevity and gender as the risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in southern Poland.

Authors:  Monika Pomorska-Wesołowska; Anna Różańska; Joanna Natkaniec; Barbara Gryglewska; Anna Szczypta; Mirosława Dzikowska; Agnieszka Chmielarczyk; Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  A Cationic Amphiphilic Random Copolymer with pH-Responsive Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sungyoup Hong; Haruko Takahashi; Enrico T Nadres; Hamid Mortazavian; Gregory A Caputo; John G Younger; Kenichi Kuroda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Cellulitis and from Osteomyelitis in a Taiwan Hospital, 2016-2018.

Authors:  Kuo-Ti Peng; Tsung-Yu Huang; Yao-Chang Chiang; Yu-Yi Hsu; Fang-Yi Chuang; Chiang-Wen Lee; Pey-Jium Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Cotrimoxazole - optimal dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Glen R Brown
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.