Literature DB >> 23212664

Efficacy of the revised Enzian classification: a retrospective analysis. Does the revised Enzian classification solve the problem of duplicate classification in rASRM and Enzian?

Dietmar Haas1, Peter Wurm, Andreas Shamiyeh, Omar Shebl, Radek Chvatal, Peter Oppelt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most widely accepted classification for endometriosis is the Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) system, but this does not take deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) into account. The Enzian classification enables clinicians to classify DIE. Due to complexity and partial overlap with rASRM, it was revised for a second time in February 2011. Using both the systems to classify lesions would be inappropriate, as they refer to different locations. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the revised Enzian classification is easier to use and avoids duplicate classifications.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 460 women admitted for endometriosis.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven of 460 patients (41 %) had histologically confirmed DIE based on the revised Enzian classification. Further classification of these 187 patients using Enzian revealed 270 retroperitoneal lesions, as some patients had several DIE-type lesions simultaneously: 66 in compartment A (rectovaginal septum, vagina), 112 in compartment B (sacrouterine ligaments, pelvic wall), 58 in compartment C (bowel), 15 with adenomyosis uteri, 7 with bladder involvement, 8 with intrinsic involvement of the ureter, and 4 with bowel involvement. All 270 lesions were classified using Enzian alone and not with the rASRM score. There were no duplicate classifications (rASRM and Enzian).
CONCLUSIONS: The revised Enzian classification is an excellent complement to the rASRM score for morphological description of DIE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23212664     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2647-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  7 in total

1.  Factors Affecting the Postoperative Bowel Function and Recurrence of Surgery for Intestinal Deep Endometriosis.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Jianzhang Wang; Yanan Zhang; Libo Zhu; Xinmei Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Endometriosis: Survey of Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options and Latest Research Work.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; M W Laschke; F Müller; P Rosenbaum; S Baum; E F Solomayer; U Ulrich
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project: I. Surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research.

Authors:  Christian M Becker; Marc R Laufer; Pamela Stratton; Lone Hummelshoj; Stacey A Missmer; Krina T Zondervan; G David Adamson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Women with Endometriosis, Especially Those Who Conceived with Assisted Reproductive Technology, Have Increased Risk of Placenta Previa: Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hyeji Jeon; Jiwon Min; Deok Kyeong Kim; Heekyung Seo; Sunkyung Kim; Yun-Sook Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis Part 2: deep endometriosis †‡¶.

Authors: 
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 6.  Molecular and Cellular Pathogenesis of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Petra A B Klemmt; Anna Starzinski-Powitz
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rev       Date:  2018-06

7.  Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis.

Authors:  Joerg Keckstein; Christian M Becker; Michel Canis; Anis Feki; Grigoris F Grimbizis; Lone Hummelshoj; Michelle Nisolle; Horace Roman; Ertan Saridogan; Vasilios Tanos; Carla Tomassetti; Uwe A Ulrich; Nathalie Vermeulen; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.