Literature DB >> 23212177

When the topic is you: genetic counselor responses to prenatal patients' requests for self-disclosure.

Jessica R Balcom1, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Heather Bemmels, Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Bonnie S LeRoy.   

Abstract

A limited amount of research indicates patient requests play a major role in genetic counselors' self-disclosure decisions and that disclosure and non-disclosure responses to patient requests may differentially affect genetic counseling processes. Studies further suggest patient requests may be more common in prenatal settings, particularly when counselors are pregnant. Empirical evidence is limited however, concerning the nature of patient requests. This study explored genetic counselors' experiences of prenatal patients' requests for self-disclosure. Four major research questions were: (1) What types of questions do prenatal patients ask that invite self-disclosure?; (2) Do pregnant genetic counselors have unique experiences with prenatal patient disclosure requests?; (3) How do genetic counselors typically respond to disclosure requests?; and (4) What strategies are effective and ineffective in responding to disclosure requests? One hundred seventy-six genetic counselors completed an online survey and 40 also participated in telephone interviews. Inductive analysis of 21 interviews revealed patient questions vary, although questions about counselor demographics are most common, and patients are more likely to ask pregnant counselors questions about their personal pregnancy decisions. Participants reported greater discomfort with self-disclosure requests during pregnancy, yet also disclosing more frequently during pregnancy. Counselor responses included personal self-disclosure, professional self-disclosure, redirection, and declining to disclose. Factors perceived as influencing disclosure included: topic, patient motivations, timing of request, quality of counseling relationship, patient characteristics, and ethical/legal responsibilities. Disclosure practices changed over time for most counselors. Additional findings, practice implications, and research recommendations are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23212177     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9554-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reflections on the meaning of clinician self-reference: are we speaking the same language?

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2011-12

2.  Life as a pregnant genetic counselor.

Authors:  Kit Clark
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Does receiving genetic counseling impact genetic counselor practice?

Authors:  Elizabeth Peters; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Erin E Ward; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VIII. Suffering and countertransference.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  "What would you do if you were me?" Effects of counselor self-disclosure versus non-disclosure in a hypothetical genetic counseling session.

Authors:  Amy L Paine; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Brittany Thomas; Mary Ahrens; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Is self-disclosure part of the genetic counselor's clinical role?

Authors:  Brittany C Thomas; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The psychic costs of empathic engagement: personal and demographic predictors of genetic counselor compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Sharanya Udipi; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Juihsien Kao; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.537

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Experience of Genetic Counselors Working with Patients Facing the Decision of Pregnancy Termination after 24 Weeks Gestation.

Authors:  Rachel N A Graziani; Laurie Nemzer; Jennifer Kerns
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Perceived Changes to Obstetric Care and the Integration of Personal and Professional Life as a Pregnant Prenatal Genetic Counselor.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rietzler; Laura E Birkeland; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Interdisciplinary education for genetic counselors: developing the concept and assessing the need in australasia.

Authors:  Kirsty J Mann; Jessica A Taylor; Paul A James; Clara Gaff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  What would you say? Genetic counseling graduate students' and counselors' hypothetical responses to patient requested self-disclosure.

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Patients' Self-Disclosure Positively Influences the Establishment of Patients' Trust in Physicians: An Empirical Study of Computer-Mediated Communication in an Online Health Community.

Authors:  Jusheng Liu; Jianjia He; Shengxue He; Chaoran Li; Changrui Yu; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.