Literature DB >> 23211896

Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6- to 24-month observation.

John M Sushynski1, Cameron M Zealand, Tatiana M Botero, James R Boynton, Robert F Majewski, Charles E Shelburne, Jan Chingchun Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multisite, multioperator, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate 2-year outcomes of diluted formocresol (DFC) compared to gray mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) as pulpotomy medicaments.
METHODS: Following the standard pulpotomy procedure, the pulp stumps of 252 primary molars in 168 healthy children were randomly covered with GMTA or DFC. Pulp chambers were filled with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM(®)) and teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns. At each follow-up appointment, the clinical status of the treated tooth was assessed and radiographs were taken. A total of 694 clinical and radiographic evaluations were analyzed.
RESULTS: Gender, study site, arch type, and tooth type did not influence treatment outcome. At the combined 6- to 24-month follow-up, clinical success in the DFC group was no different than for the GMTA group. Radiographically, a significantly lower success rate was found in the DFC group vs the MTA group at all time points (P<.01). Dentin bridge formation was observed at a significantly higher frequency among the GMTA group (P<.01), while internal root resorption was observed at a higher frequency in the DFC group (P<.01).
CONCLUSION: At the combined 6- to 24-month follow-up, gray mineral trioxide aggregate demonstrated significantly better radiographic outcomes vs diluted formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23211896      PMCID: PMC4889335     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  41 in total

Review 1.  Mineral trioxide aggregate: a new material for endodontics.

Authors:  R S Schwartz; M Mauger; D J Clement; W A Walker
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars: an in vivo study.

Authors:  S Naik; A H Hegde
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2005-03

3.  Dentin bridge formation after white mineral trioxide aggregate (white MTA) pulpotomies in primary molars.

Authors:  Myriam Maroto; Elena Barbería; Vicente Vera; Franklin García-Godoy
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Effects of varying concentrations of formocresol on RNA synthesis of connective tissues in sponge implants.

Authors:  L H Straffon; S S Han
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1970-06

5.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies employing calcium hydroxide and trioxide mineral aggregate.

Authors:  Celio Percinoto; Alessandra Maia de Castro; Leila Maria Cesario Pereira Pinto
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment.

Authors:  F K Ng; L B Messer
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2008-06

7.  Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.

Authors:  H Noorollahian
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth.

Authors:  A B S Moretti; V T Sakai; T M Oliveira; A P C Fornetti; C F Santos; M A A M Machado; R C C Abdo
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Deniz Sonmez; Saziye Sari; Tuğba Cetinbaş
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 10.  Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria.

Authors:  A B Fuks; L Papagiannoulis
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-06
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol.

Authors:  E Stringhini Junior; M E B Vitcel; L B Oliveira
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 2.  Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Armin Shirvani; Saeed Asgary
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized human primary molars: 42-month follow-up and survival analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Mettlach; Cameron M Zealand; Tatiana M Botero; James R Boynton; Robert F Majewski; Jan ChingChun Hu
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Diluted Formocresol Pulpotomy: Prospective and Retrospective Study Outcomes.

Authors:  Neehal Ghoniem; Veena Vaidyanathan; Cameron M Zealand; John M Sushynski; Sarah M Mettlach; Tatiana M Botero; Robert F Majewski; James R Boynton; Jan C-C Hu
Journal:  J Mich Dent Assoc       Date:  2018-04

5.  Comparison of indirect pulp treatment and iRoot BP Plus pulpotomy in primary teeth with extremely deep caries: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Chen; Hongmei Zhang; Jie Zhong; Wenjuan Yan; Bichen Lin; Meili Ding; Shihua Xue; Bin Xia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth.

Authors:  Iman Parisay; Jamileh Ghoddusi; Maryam Forghani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 7.  Dentinogenic Specificity in the Preclinical Evaluation of Vital Pulp Treatment Strategies: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tziafas; Konstantinos Kodonas
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-27

8.  Success Rates of Pulpotomies in Primary Molars Using Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Yeliz Guven; Sermin Dicle Aksakal; Nilufer Avcu; Gulcan Unsal; Elif Bahar Tuna; Oya Aktoren
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  BiodentineTM versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Omar Abd El Sadek El Meligy; Najlaa Mohamed Alamoudi; Sulaiman Mohamed Allazzam; Azza Abdel Mohsen El-Housseiny
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.

Authors:  Bharti Kusum; Kumar Rakesh; Khanna Richa
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.