Literature DB >> 23211440

Calculation of mercury's effects on neurodevelopment.

Philippe Grandjean, Celine Pichery, Martine Bellanger, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23211440      PMCID: PMC3548290          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1206033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
Bellinger (2012) recently estimated the loss of cognitive function in terms of Full-Scale intelligence quotient (IQ) in children exposed to certain environmental chemicals. To ascertain pre-natal exposures of methyl-mercury (MeHg) in children, he used exposure data on mercury (Hg) concentrations in hair of U.S. women of childbearing age (16–49 years) from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 1999–2000 (McDowell et al. 2004). Bellinger applied a regression coefficient of –0.18 IQ points per microgram per gram increase in maternal hair as calculated by Axelrad et al. (2007). However, the results of Axelrad et al. (2007) relied on incomplete data from a prospective study in the Faroe Islands and on non-adjusted results from the Seychelles study, later found to be confounded by nutrients from seafood (Strain et al. 2008). Bellinger (2012) then applied the regression coefficient to hair Hg levels > 1.11 µg/g (90th percentile), because this level corresponds to the reference dose of MeHg established many years ago. Assuming a concentration of 1.73 µg/g (95th percentile) as the midpoint (rather than the average, which is higher) for the hair Hg levels of the 10% of U.S. women with a level > 1.11 µg/g, he estimated a total IQ loss of 284,580 points. We believe that Bellinger’s general approach is sound but that the dose–response information is outdated, a caveat that Bellinger noted, although it was not reflected in the summary table. We therefore wish to complement these calculations using updated dose–response data. Prospective data justify a lower threshold Hg level of 0.58 µg/g hair corresponding to 50% of the reference dose (Grandjean and Budtz-Jørgensen 2007). In addition, a 1-µg/g increase in hair Hg concentration is more likely associated with an average adverse impact of 0.465 IQ points, as discussed by Pichery et al. (2012). Assuming a log-
normal exposure distribution, a 75th percentile hair Hg concentration of 0.42 µg/g, and a 90th percentile of 1.11 µg/g as reported by McDowell et al. (2004), we estimate that 18.5% of women exceed a threshold of 0.58 µg/g hair Hg and that the average concentration for 0.58–1.11 µg/g is approximately 0.8 µg/g. For the sake of comparing these values with Bellinger’s calculations (Bellinger 2012), we used a median concentration of 1.73 µg/g as the average hair Hg level of the 10% of U.S. women with a level > 1.11 µg/g. On the basis of these assumptions, we calculated a total IQ loss for the U.S. population of children 0–5 years of age (n = 25.5 million) to be 1,590,000 IQ points, or 264,000 IQ points per year. We recently used similar calculations to estimate the annual costs of Hg pollution in France (Pichery et al. 2012), a country one-fifth the size of the United States. At slightly higher exposure levels, the annual loss in IQ points was estimated to be 157,000. Greater losses were obtained using a log-scale effect (Pichery et al. 2012). With an estimated value of each IQ point of $18,000 in terms of life-time earnings, the current loss of IQ points associated with MeHg exposure represents a very substantial value to society.
  6 in total

1.  Total imprecision of exposure biomarkers: implications for calculating exposure limits.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Esben Budtz-Jørgensen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Associations of maternal long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, methyl mercury, and infant development in the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study.

Authors:  J J Strain; Philip W Davidson; Maxine P Bonham; Emeir M Duffy; Abbie Stokes-Riner; Sally W Thurston; Julie M W Wallace; Paula J Robson; Conrad F Shamlaye; Lesley A Georger; Jean Sloane-Reeves; Elsa Cernichiari; Richard L Canfield; Christopher Cox; Li Shan Huang; Joanne Janciuras; Gary J Myers; Thomas W Clarkson
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 3.  A strategy for comparing the contributions of environmental chemicals and other risk factors to neurodevelopment of children.

Authors:  David C Bellinger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Economic evaluation of health consequences of prenatal methylmercury exposure in France.

Authors:  Céline Pichery; Martine Bellanger; Denis Zmirou-Navier; Nadine Fréry; Sylvaine Cordier; Anne Roue-Legall; Philippe Hartemann; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Hair mercury levels in U.S. children and women of childbearing age: reference range data from NHANES 1999-2000.

Authors:  Margaret A McDowell; Charles F Dillon; John Osterloh; P Michael Bolger; Edo Pellizzari; Reshan Fernando; Ruben Montes de Oca; Susan E Schober; Thomas Sinks; Robert L Jones; Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Dose-response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data.

Authors:  Daniel A Axelrad; David C Bellinger; Louise M Ryan; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Evaluation and assessment of the efficacy of an abatement strategy in a former lead smelter community, Boolaroo, Australia.

Authors:  P J Harvey; M P Taylor; L J Kristensen; S Grant-Vest; M Rouillon; L Wu; H K Handley
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Therapeutic and Protective Potency of Bee Pollen Against Neurotoxic Effects Induced by Prenatal Exposure of Rats to Methyl Mercury.

Authors:  May Al-Osaimi; Afaf El-Ansary; Sooad Al-Daihan; Ramesa Shafi Bhat; Abir Ben Bacha
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 3.  Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Philip J Landrigan
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Fish Consumption for the Adult Population of Hawai'i, Collected with a Self-Reported Household Survey.

Authors:  Kathleen Kromer Baker; Corilee A Watters; James E Dannemiller; Scott T Iwamura; Barbara A Brooks
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 5.  Comparison of Recreational Fish Consumption Advisories Across the USA.

Authors:  Brittany M Cleary; Megan E Romano; Celia Y Chen; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Kathryn A Crawford
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-01

6.  Using the Morris water maze to assess spatial learning and memory in weanling mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Barnhart; Dongren Yang; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Health effects associated with measured levels of contaminants in the Arctic.

Authors:  Pál Weihe; Fróði Debes; Jónrit Halling; Maria Skaalum Petersen; Gina Muckle; Jon Øyvind Odland; Alexey Dudarev; Pierre Ayotte; Éric Dewailly; Philippe Grandjean; Eva Bonefeld-Jørgensen
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 8.  Calculation of the disease burden associated with environmental chemical exposures: application of toxicological information in health economic estimation.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Martine Bellanger
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Global health effects of future atmospheric mercury emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Zhengcheng Song; Shaojian Huang; Peng Zhang; Yiming Peng; Peipei Wu; Jing Gu; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Huanxin Zhang; Shiliang Wu; Feiyue Wang; Long Chen; Shuxiao Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention.

Authors:  Martine Bellanger; Céline Pichery; Dominique Aerts; Marika Berglund; Argelia Castaño; Mája Cejchanová; Pierre Crettaz; Fred Davidson; Marta Esteban; Marc E Fischer; Anca Elena Gurzau; Katarina Halzlova; Andromachi Katsonouri; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Gudrun Koppen; Danuta Ligocka; Ana Miklavčič; M Fátima Reis; Peter Rudnai; Janja Snoj Tratnik; Pál Weihe; Esben Budtz-Jørgensen; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.