Literature DB >> 23211158

Over-reliance of D-dimer in isolation to exclude venous thrombosis should be avoided.

Jecko Thachil.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2012        PMID： 23211158      PMCID： PMC3481494          DOI： 10.3399/bjgp12X658188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The D-Dimer test in combination with a decision rule for ruling out deep vein thrombosis in primary care: diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson; Christopher P Price; Jane Wolstenholme; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Variation in the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for suspected deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  S Goodacre; F C Sampson; A J Sutton; S Mason; F Morris
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2005-06-13

3.  Normal D-dimer levels in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  I Kutinsky; S Blakley; V Roche
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-26

Review 4.  Decrease in sensitivity of D-dimer for acute venous thromboembolism after starting anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F Couturaud; C Kearon; S M Bates; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  A negative D-dimer does not exclude venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy.

Authors:  M S To; B J Hunt; C Nelson-Piercy
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.246
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Misinterpreting risk and test results delays diagnosis in a patient with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sam Babak; Krishna B Sriram
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.