Literature DB >> 23211016

Have the boundaries of the 'grey zone' of perinatal resuscitation changed for extremely preterm infants over 20 years?

J Condie1, L Caldarelli, L Tarr, C Gray, T Rodriquez, J Lantos, W Meadow.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the boundaries of the grey zone of discretionary resuscitation over the past 20 years.
BACKGROUND: As the likelihood of survival improves over time, the BW- and GA-specific boundaries of discretionary nonresuscitation should fall. HYPOTHESIS: Between 1988 and 2008 reductions in BW- and GA-specific mortality would drive a parallel reduction in BW and GA boundaries of discretionary resuscitation.
METHODS: We determined the likelihood of resuscitation and survival to NICU discharge for all infants born <700 g or <26 gestational weeks from 1988 to 2008. In addition, for 1988, 1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008, we determined the BW and GA for the 10 smallest infants who were resuscitated, and the 10 largest infants who were not resuscitated. We excluded any infant born with congenital anomaly.
RESULTS: Mortality fell from 80% in 1988 to 28% in 2008, and as expected, the percentage who were resuscitated rose from 63% in 1988-93 to 95% in 2004-2008. However, unexpectedly, over the 20-year study period, the smallest infants who were resuscitated despite extreme immaturity did not change (450-550 g and 23-24 weeks) and the largest infants not resuscitated did not change (600-700 g and 23-24 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Neither the BW nor GA boundaries of the grey zone of discretionary resuscitation have fallen over the past 20 years. Factors guiding resuscitation at the border of viability are complex and incompletely understood. ©2012 The Author(s)/Acta Paediatrica ©2012 Foundation Acta Paediatrica.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23211016     DOI: 10.1111/apa.12119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Perinatal factors associated with active intensive treatment at the border of viability: a population-based study.

Authors:  I Litmanovitz; B Reichman; S Arnon; V Boyko; L Lerner-Geva; S Bauer-Rusak; T Dolfin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  The attitudes of neonatologists towards extremely preterm infants: a Q methodological study.

Authors:  Katie Gallagher; Narendra Aladangady; Neil Marlow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Trends in Overall Mortality, and Timing and Cause of Death among Extremely Preterm Infants near the Limit of Viability.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Park; Yun Sil Chang; Sein Sung; So Yoon Ahn; Won Soon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis?

Authors:  Lynn Gillam; Dominic Wilkinson; Vicki Xafis; David Isaacs
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.954

6.  Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians' preferences despite guideline.

Authors:  Rosa Geurtzen; Jos Draaisma; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Arno van Heijst; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.