Literature DB >> 23210916

Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding.

J Perdigão1, Ana Sezinando, Paulo C Monteiro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effect of dentin age and adhesive composition on the microtensile dentin bond strengths (μTBS) of five dentin adhesives.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted caries-free human teeth were assigned to the appropriate age group: less than 21 years of age (<21), 21-40 years of age (21-40), and greater than 40 years of age (>40). For each age group, specimens were randomly divided into five dentin adhesives: (1) Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE), a one-step self-etch adhesive; (2) Experimental Adper Easy Bond without the Vitrebond Co-polymer (CP) (EBnoCP, 3M ESPE); (3) Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE), a two-step etch&amp;rinse adhesive; (4) Experimental Adper Single Bond Plus without CP (SBnoCP, 3M ESPE); and (5) Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE), a three-step etch&amp;rinse adhesive, as the control group. Specimens were sectioned in X and Y directions and the resulting beams were tested to failure in tension mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was computed using t-test and two-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher least significant difference multiple comparison post hoc test at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The highest mean μTBS values were obtained in the control group (MP) for all age groups. EB resulted in statistically similar mean μTBS compared to EBnoCP for all age groups: p = 0.538 for (<21); p = 0.974 for (21-40); and p = 0.909 for (>40). SB resulted in statistically higher mean μTBS than SBnoCP for all age groups [p<0.009 for (<21); p<0.028 for (21-40); and p<0.041 for (>40)]. MP, the control group, resulted in statistically lower mean μTBS when applied to the oldest age group (>40) compared to the youngest age group (<21), at p < 0.04. When means were pooled for the variable 'age group,' SB resulted in significantly higher mean μTBS than SBnoCP at p < 0.009, while EB resulted in statistically similar mean μTBS compared to EBnoCP (p=0.9). MP resulted in statistically higher mean μTBS than all other adhesives-SB (p<0.0001), SBnoCP (p<0.0001), EBnoCP (p<0.022), and EB (p<0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: The substrate age influenced the bonding ability of the three-step etch&amp;rinse adhesive. The presence of a carboxylic-based polymer (CP) enhanced the bonding ability of the two-step etch&amp;rinse adhesive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23210916     DOI: 10.2341/12-307-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  7 in total

1.  Dentin-composite bond strength measurement using the Brazilian disk test.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Yung-Chung Chen; Yuping Li; Joel Rudney; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Two-year clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: Influence of subject's age and dentin etching time.

Authors:  David Cardoso Sandes Farias; Guilherme Carpena Lopes; Luiz Narciso Baratieri
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of air-blowing time and long-term storage on bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin.

Authors:  Pipop Saikaew; Jiale Fu; A F M Almas Chowdhury; Ricardo M Carvalho; Hidehiko Sano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Bond Capability of Universal Adhesive Systems to Dentin in Self-etch Mode after Short-term Storage and Cyclic Loading.

Authors:  Daniele Morosini Costa; Deise Caren Somacal; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-06-30

5.  New Dual-cure Resin-based Material in Occlusal and Occluso-proximal Restorations of Primary Teeth: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cinthia Maria Baggio de Luca da Cunha; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Thalita de Paris Matos; Pamela Malaquias; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Denise Stadler Wambier; Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 7.  The microtensile bond strength test: Its historical background and application to bond testing.

Authors:  Hidehiko Sano; Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury; Pipop Saikaew; Mariko Matsumoto; Shuhei Hoshika; Monica Yamauti
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2019-11-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.