Literature DB >> 23209133

Systematic versus random sampling in stereological studies.

Mark J West.   

Abstract

The sampling that takes place at all levels of an experimental design must be random if the estimate is to be unbiased in a statistical sense. There are two fundamental ways by which one can make a random sample of the sections and positions to be probed on the sections. Using a card-sampling analogy, one can pick any card at all out of a deck of cards. This is referred to as independent random sampling because the sampling of any one card is made without reference to the position of the other cards. The other approach to obtaining a random sample would be to pick a card within a set number of cards and others at equal intervals within the deck. Systematic sampling along one axis of many biological structures is more efficient than random sampling, because most biological structures are not randomly organized. This article discusses the merits of systematic versus random sampling in stereological studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23209133     DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top071837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc        ISSN: 1559-6095


  2 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of angiogenesis, perfused blood vessels and endothelial tip cells in the postnatal mouse brain.

Authors:  Thomas Wälchli; José María Mateos; Oliver Weinman; Daniela Babic; Luca Regli; Simon P Hoerstrup; Holger Gerhardt; Martin E Schwab; Johannes Vogel
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Detection of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Complexes in Postmortem Human Brain by Proximity Ligation Assay.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Andrew J Dwork; Pierre Trifilieff; Jonathan A Javitch
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2020-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.